Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

As modern workplaces evolves, there is virgous debate on traditional working weekends or in the extension of weekends, Im agree with this point that the workings hours should be shorter and the extension of weekends. In this essay, I will argue about this and ellaborate my points.

On the one hand, implementing a short hours of work in a week can allow workers to spend their time with their family, Its, help alot to alleviate their strees and also very essential for their health, Moreover, it is alow them to spend their free time in their favourite activity if someones love football in the weekends they play football As a ressult aa person or employe become more active also in the longer weekends siblings iften visit each other houses. Furthermorre i think its the best way to spend the lifes in a sustainable way. Having noon working hours can help them to prevent burst out.

Before the aforementioned personal advantages, its also plays very crucial role in country economics. non working hours allow them to spend their leisure time with many noticaeble activities which makes them to feel good or healthy. In additionall, workers enjoys their leisure time and in this way companies hire more staff. As a result, the employment rate is increase and the unemployment is decearese and also visit differrent side of your country can also creates the best opportunities for tourism and country became popular. For instance, vietnam generate such a good high gdp due to the tourist and their own peoples who prefer to visit their own country places instead of other country.

In conclusion, reducing the length of the workweek and extending the break period offer numerous benefits for employees, enhancing their quality of life. By promoting a better work-life balance and stimulating economic growth, shorter work days can lead to increased productivity and higher employee satisfaction.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by taking a clear position that the working week should be shorter and weekends extended. The main ideas, such as improved family time, reduced stress, and economic stimulation through tourism and employment, are relevant and directly answer the prompt. However, some ideas are under-developed or lack full elaboration. For instance, the point regarding Vietnam and GDP is introduced abruptly without sufficient explanation of how shorter work hours directly caused this economic outcome. To reach a higher level, the writer needs to extend these supporting arguments with greater depth and clearer real-world examples that directly align with the core thesis.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a recognisable introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Paragraphing is used to separate distinct themes, such as personal benefits and economic impacts. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical and faulty. Devices like 'On the one hand' are used without a corresponding 'On the other hand', and referencing is occasionally unclear, as seen in confusing transitions like 'Before the aforementioned personal advantages'. Furthermore, sentences within paragraphs can feel disjointed due to run-on structures and weak cohesive links. Improving the logical flow between sentences and ensuring precise transitional phrases would significantly enhance the overall progression of ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common items such as 'sustainable way', 'work-life balance', and 'employment rate'. However, there are noticeable lexical errors, including spelling mistakes ('virgous', 'streel', 'ellaborate', 'alicates', 'noticaeble', 'inadditionall', 'decearese') and awkward word choices ('burst out' instead of 'burnout', 'non working hours' instead of 'reduced working hours'). While these errors do not completely impede communication, they occur frequently enough to restrict the score. To improve, the writer should focus on expanding word-formation knowledge, refining collocations, and paying closer attention to standard spelling.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating an attempt at varied syntactic structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues ('workplaces evolves', 'employe become', 'country became'), incorrect verb tenses ('is increase', 'tourism and country became'), and punctuation errors like run-on sentences and comma splices ('Its, help alot to alleviate their strees and also very essential...'). Furthermore, prepositional usage and articles are sometimes mishandled inside grammatical patterns. Although the meaning can usually be deciphered, these persistent errors cause difficulty for the reader and reflect a limited level of structural control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.