Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Nowadays, some companies are converting the working week into four days. I believe this approach not only makes employee more productive, but it also enhances their free time and consequently their mood.

A short working week implies a longer weekend, which enables employees to develop their passions. In fact, many people claim that the weekend is too short to do all the household chores and develop passions and the same time. Most of the times workers have to chose between the tidiness of their home and their hobbies. Indeed it is quite hard to carve out some spare time during the working week. A longer weekend would allow them to have more time for themselves and their family.

Many research papers have already highlighted that this approach fosters employee productivity enhancing their good mood. If an employee feel refreshed and relieved he is able to give more to the firm without feeling stuck. For example, there have been some periods of my life in which I have worked long hours without paid overwork and this made me feel frustrated. I believe that if I had worked less I would have been much more productive and useful to the company.

In conclusion, I think short working weeks would be an advantage for both the employee and the firm, as it would make the former more productive and the latter more profitable. As I did, many employees already work more hours than they should, longer weekends would be a joyful gift both for them and their firm.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the opening: you support a shorter working week, and the conclusion restates the benefits for both employees and firms. You address the main implications through two relevant points: more time for hobbies and family, and improved productivity linked to workers feeling refreshed. The personal example about working long hours also helps explain your view. These ideas are extended with reasons, although the productivity argument relies partly on the broad claim that “many research papers” support it, without identifying evidence or explaining the mechanism in much detail. To strengthen the response further, develop this point with a specific example or explain how a longer weekend could improve work quality or reduce errors. Overall, the task is addressed clearly, with some scope for more precise support.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear four-paragraph structure: an introduction stating your view, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from personal wellbeing to productivity is logical, and linking expressions such as “In fact,” “Indeed,” “For example,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. The final paragraph also brings the two main benefits together. Cohesion is generally effective, though some links feel slightly formulaic, and the relationship between the research claim and the personal example could be made more explicit. For instance, explain how your experience illustrates the productivity point rather than moving directly from one to the other. More varied referencing and smoother connections between supporting details would make the organisation feel more seamless.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including phrases such as “carve out some spare time,” “fosters employee productivity,” and “feeling stuck.” These choices show an attempt to move beyond basic wording, and your meaning remains clear throughout. However, some collocations and word forms are not natural, which limits precision: “enhances their free time” would be better expressed as “gives them more free time,” while “enhancing their good mood” is awkward. “Paid overwork” is also not the usual expression for the situation described. To move further, focus on accurate, natural combinations of words and choose precise terms for workplace conditions, rather than relying on broad phrases such as “give more to the firm.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including the contrast in “not only … but it also …,” a conditional sentence (“if I had worked less I would have been…”), and clauses introduced by “which” and “as.” These structures help you explain causes and consequences, and the message is consistently understandable. Some grammatical errors remain, however. For example, “makes employee more productive” needs a plural or article, “Most of the times” should be “Most of the time,” and “If an employee feel” requires subject–verb agreement. The sentence beginning “Many research papers…” also needs clearer grammatical connection between “productivity” and “enhancing.” Review agreement, articles, and sentence construction, while retaining the range of complex forms you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.