Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

First of all the worker man and the non-worker man in the opinion are different in mostly way.

Yes,I'm agree to working week are shorter at this time money are mor important for everyone to earn big for this family and manage of all the expenses home rent.Family man person to earn for your child and your daily bases vital item that the reason to working week are more crucial.

One individual are to Earn moeny at home at other side in your family member are five to six and you have money for crucial to your family wishes.Want's are more like your this.

One way to disagree to weekend are mostly like lazy people to enjoy weekend.Because their are only for single people to enjoy your life and spend money in your want's.but the side weekend are mostly family to spend her time to this family and near beaches and at home and the differnt location in peaceful place.weekend are not a shorter and not a longer to public.In week two days are enough for the public to weekend.

weekend are the not for longer to enjoy with your family.My opinion are two days are enough to in one week for weekend at the other end the yearly are longer holidays are over the country to execute the rule of his country.

In Conclusion are the agree or disgaree for this statement for wroker or weekend are no longer in my opinion are not longer weekend enough for two days in one week.I'm aagree this my statement.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You do express a position: the conclusion says that two weekend days are enough, so you disagree with extending the weekend. However, the opening claim that workers have different opinions is not developed, and the response does not clearly explain whether or why the working week itself should be shorter. The discussion shifts between earning money, family needs, and weekend leisure without establishing a clear argument about the proposed change. For example, “money are more important” is offered as a reason, but its connection to shorter working hours is unclear. To strengthen the response, state your position directly in the introduction and develop two relevant reasons with specific explanations or examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

There is an attempt to organise the response into an opening, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, and expressions such as “First of all,” “One way,” and “In Conclusion” signal stages of the discussion. However, ideas are not arranged in a coherent progression: the first body paragraph moves from income to family expenses and wishes, while the next combines laziness, single people, family outings, and the number of weekend days. Connections between sentences are often unclear, and repeated references to “weekend” do not show how each point relates to the argument. Plan one main idea per paragraph, then use clear linking sentences to explain how each example supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some task-related vocabulary, including “working week,” “expenses,” “family,” “holidays,” and “weekend,” so the topic is recognisable. However, the range is basic and repetitive, and inaccurate word choice or spelling sometimes makes meaning difficult to follow. Phrases such as “worker man,” “daily bases vital item,” and “execute the rule of his country” are unclear or unnatural in this context; “moeny” and “disgaree” also show spelling problems. Build a more precise vocabulary for work schedules and their effects, and check collocations and spelling. For instance, describe “household expenses” or “family responsibilities” rather than relying on repeated, vague references to money and wishes.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

You attempt to form longer sentences and use basic connectors, but sentence structures are very limited and frequent errors often distort the intended meaning. Examples include “I'm agree to working week are shorter,” “One individual are,” and “weekend are not a shorter and not a longer,” where agreement, verb forms, and sentence construction are not controlled. Articles and punctuation are also inconsistent, as in “at home at other side” and “Yes,I'm.” Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then combine related ideas with clauses such as “because” or “although.” Check subject–verb agreement and verb patterns, for example, “I agree that the working week should be shorter.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.