Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The working weeks should be shorter following with extented weekends.

Shorter working weeks can be great for working individuals especially in todays hectic lifestyle where people have to work long hour shifts for a whole month.This can be very beneficial for individuals who work abroad or live far from their hometown and families so they would get more time to spend with their families and will be able able to visit their hometown quite often. Meanwhile, extended weekends can also be great for corprate individuals with benefits like less stress, work life balance or motivation, For instance, An individual who works for long weeks with shorter holidays would not be as dedicated and mentally stable then a person who works for less week days and have flexible shedule. As science also backs this up that constant breaks are much needed from work to avoid work related stress.

On the flip side, this can aslo creat some work ethic or work balance realted issues. Because too much gap or longer weekends can also disasociate individuals from working interest or environment. Loger holidays can make it hard for working people to maintance the pace and move back to work with the same energy. For example, somone who takes shorter break would be more activley partivipating into work related taks then somone who take breaks quite often.

I disagree with the statment because i feel like this does not well allign with the corprate world and it can also affects the individuals working interest . Providing flexible or customized shedules migh be a better option in my eye rather then longer holidays and shorter working weeks.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear in the conclusion: you disagree with shorter working weeks and prefer flexible or customised schedules. You address both potential benefits, such as more family time and reduced stress, and drawbacks, including difficulty returning to work after longer breaks. These are relevant points, and the example contrasting workers with shorter and longer breaks helps illustrate your reasoning. However, some ideas are asserted rather than fully explained: for instance, the claim that longer weekends reduce “working interest” would be stronger with a specific explanation or example. The opening also appears to support the proposal, so clarify earlier that you ultimately disagree and connect each paragraph more directly to that position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an opening, a paragraph presenting advantages, a paragraph discussing disadvantages, and a concluding position. Linking phrases such as “Meanwhile,” “On the flip side,” and “For example” help signal relationships between ideas. However, the progression is not always smooth. The first paragraph mainly supports shorter weeks, while the final paragraph rejects them, and the opening does not prepare the reader for this contrast. Some connections are also awkward or unclear, particularly “Because too much gap…” as a sentence fragment and the shift from work-life balance to the claim about dedication. Make the position consistent from the introduction and use clearer topic sentences to guide each paragraph.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “work-life balance,” “motivation,” “work-related stress,” and “flexible schedules.” These phrases show an attempt to discuss workplace effects rather than relying only on basic terms. However, the range and control are limited by repeated general wording such as “great,” “individuals,” and “work,” as well as inaccurate or unclear choices including “work ethic or work balance related issues” and “working interest.” Spelling errors such as “extented,” “corprate,” and “maintance” are noticeable and sometimes make reading less fluent. Aim for more precise collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, explain whether you mean reduced engagement, difficulty readjusting, or lower productivity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional example beginning “An individual who works…” and a sentence explaining that longer holidays can make it hard to maintain a work pace. Meaning is generally recoverable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. For example, “a person who works for less week days and have” has an agreement error, while “would not be as dedicated … then a person” uses an incorrect comparison structure. The sentence beginning “Because too much gap…” is incomplete, and “it can also affects” has an incorrect verb form. Review subject–verb agreement, comparative structures, and sentence boundaries, then proofread punctuation and spacing so complex ideas remain easy to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.