Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In todays world, where everyone's health is not same as it used to be in the past. The working week has to be shorter and workers should get a longer weekend.

Considerable proportion of individuals believe that the quality of food and grains are not same as before. Which is also a contributing factor of health issues. I strongly agree that the working week has to be shorter and we should get a longer weekend. Weekend plays an important role in our life to relax our body and to restart our life in an energetic way. Longer weekend can help us to accomplish our task which is on pending. For instance, we are working five days a week which is so exhausting for me. I can not pay attention to my family and my kids needs.

Longer weekend can help me to go out and freshen up myself. It can also give me a chance to spend some time in nature.

Other significant factor is a hectic week and daily life hustle and bustle can trigger a depression in students as well. Students have a load of burden to get a higher rank and to work part time to bear the cost of living. Longer weekends can also help students to focus on their studies and to take some rest.

To sum up, I strongly agree with the statement that we should work less days and should get longer weekends because another reason is our elders want their kids to spend some time with them on weekends as well

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you strongly agree that the working week should be shorter, and you give relevant reasons involving rest, family time, and students’ pressures. The personal example about working five days and struggling to attend to your family helps make the argument concrete. This meets the task well overall, but the support is uneven: the opening discussion of food quality and health is not clearly connected to shorter working weeks, and the points about students and older relatives are asserted rather than explained with specific examples. To strengthen the response further, link each reason directly to reduced working hours and develop the less-supported points with a clear explanation or example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction to reasons and a concluding summary. Paragraphing separates the main discussion from the point about students, and phrases such as “For instance” and “To sum up” help signal examples and closure. However, the progression between ideas is not always clear. The opening moves from health and food quality to working hours without explaining the connection, while “Other significant factor” introduces a new point abruptly. Some links are repetitive, particularly the repeated use of “Longer weekend.” Improve cohesion by organising each body paragraph around one reason and using clearer references to show how each example supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “exhausting,” “hustle and bustle,” “burden,” and “cost of living,” and the reader can generally understand your intended meaning. There is also an attempt to use less common expressions, such as “freshen up myself.” However, several phrases are imprecise or unnatural, including “accomplish our task which is on pending,” “restart our life,” and “a contributing factor of health issues.” Repetition of “longer weekend” and “help” also limits the range. Aim for more precise collocations and vary repeated terms; for example, describe how additional time off supports recovery, family responsibilities, or study rather than relying on broad phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “the quality of food and grains are not same as before” and a longer sentence about students’ pressures. Meaning is usually recoverable, but errors occur across the response and sometimes make sentences awkward. Examples include the fragment “In todays world, where everyone's health is not same…,” the agreement error “the quality … are,” and missing articles in “not same” and “trigger a depression.” The final sentence also lacks clear punctuation and has an awkwardly joined structure. Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and main verb, and check agreement, articles, and punctuation when revising.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.