Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is widely debated that weekends should be longer for employees and the working week should be shorter. I strongly agree with the long weekend as it brings numerous positive outcomes, including increase in creativity and improvement in the overall well being of workers.

Longer weekends increase workers' creativity. When people get more time on weekend, they not only complete their sleep requirement but also give time to their hobbies such as gardening, reading or watching movies. As a result, their brain takes a break from the cyclic work routine and becomes fresh and active. This gives rise to innovativeness. This creativity not only enhances the productivity of workers but also improves the quality of work they produce. That is the reason why countries with longer weekends have more creative workers. A compelling illustration can be seen in countries like Finland and Japan where people have a longer weekend. Owing to this, people spend more time in other activities and when they return to work, they work creatively and enthusiastically.

Along with creativity, long weekends improve the well being of employees. Jobians with extra time on weekend spend more time with their family and friends. As these things remind someone about the importance of life, workers regain the essense of being. Socialization, human connection, and leisure give rise to positive impact on mental and physical health of people. While some companies overlook the significance of these factors in life, some give their worker more time to engage in these activities keeping in mind the impact that is created by these activities. This, for instance, can be seen in companies such as Nestle and Angro where they give their employees long weekend to fulfill their requirements of life. These workers, in turn, bring more results to the company.

To conclude, it is suggested that weekends should be longer keeping in mind their advantages. I agree with the statement because long weekend not only increases workers' innovation but it also reconnects them with life. All these thing are crucial for a normal human living.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.0
Coherence and Cohesion7.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.5
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion: you agree that the working week should be shorter, and you give two relevant reasons—greater creativity and improved well-being. Both body paragraphs explain a cause-and-effect link, and the examples of hobbies and time with family help illustrate your points. This fits the task well. However, some support is over-generalised or not fully established: the claim that Finland and Japan have longer weekends and therefore more creative workers is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the company examples are not explained in enough detail to show how their policies produce the stated benefits. Develop these examples more cautiously and explain the mechanism or provide a specific, credible illustration to make the argument more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two focused body paragraphs and a conclusion. The progression from creativity to well-being is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Along with creativity” and “To conclude” make the organisation clear. Within paragraphs, you generally connect explanations to their outcomes—for example, more leisure is linked to a refreshed mind and then to improved work. Some linking is a little repetitive or mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “This” and “As a result,” and the long sentence beginning “While some companies overlook…” carries several ideas at once. Use a wider range of natural transitions and make references more precise so readers can immediately identify what “these activities” and “This” refer to.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “cyclic work routine,” “innovativeness,” “socialization,” and “mental and physical health.” These choices help express the main ideas, and the meaning is generally clear. However, attempts at less common or formal wording sometimes lead to inaccurate or unnatural expressions. “Jobians” is not an appropriate term for employees, “essense of being” is unclear in this context, and “give rise to positive impact” is an awkward collocation. There are also spelling or word-form slips, such as “well being” and “All these thing.” Aim for precise, natural collocations rather than elevated wording for its own sake, and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses such as “When people get more time…” and “While some companies overlook…”. Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, and the essay’s structure is generally controlled. Some grammatical errors remain, however. In “including increase in creativity,” the article is missing; “long weekend not only increases… but it also reconnects” has inconsistent number agreement; and “All these thing are” needs plural agreement. The sentence beginning “While some companies…” is also difficult to control because several clauses and ideas are joined together. Review articles, singular/plural agreement and parallel structures, and divide overloaded sentences where needed. This would build on your existing range and make the writing more consistently accurate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.