Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the modern wrokplaces, individuals tend to work for longer weekends. Certain people believe that they should be shorter.While shorter weekend can be beneficial for businesses, because they will meet consumer demands and increase productivity, I largely agree with this notion, because it can result in creating balance between work and life, and allow people to spend more time with their families.

On of the main advantages is that prolonged holidays enable employees to spend significant amount of time with their families.As a result, it creates a strong sense of connectivity between them.Not only they will be able to complete their houseld responsibilities, but can also work on their skills. It will enable them to stay healthy through getting enough time to exercise. Additionally, it can also reduce social disparity, because having sufficient time encourage them to meet their neighbours and people around them.

Moreover, there are some other upsides of this practice that cannot be entirely overlooked. A significant benefit is that it can alleviate pressure on public transport during peak hours. Less people will use tranport to reach their workplaces. Longer weekend can create work-life balance. They will work more efficiently after having rest for some days. If there is no balance, this can bring dissatisfaction among families. It would be stressful and frustrating for them. Working for hours and days without rest, there are highly chances of making mistakes. Therefore, employers must focus on giving them flexibile working hours. However, it should be managed properly, so that companies can timely meet consumer demands.

In conclusion, I largely agree that employees should be given longer weekend to complete their other responsibilities such as domestic tasks and working on expertise, but it should not be managed at the expense of businesses productivity.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you largely agree that workers should have longer weekends, and you address the task with relevant reasons, including family time, exercise, work-life balance and reduced pressure on public transport. The conclusion also recognises the need to protect business productivity, so the response covers both the proposed benefit and a qualification. Some ideas are more fully explained than others: the link between longer weekends and “social disparity” is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the transport point is not clearly connected to the central argument. To strengthen the response, explain how a shorter working week could preserve output—for example, through better-rested staff or adjusted schedules—and develop fewer points with specific support. The position is sustained, but some support remains general or unclear, limiting fuller development of the task’s ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and the main position is generally easy to follow. Linking expressions such as “As a result,” “Moreover” and “Therefore” help signal relationships between ideas. However, progression within the body paragraphs is uneven: the first moves from family connection to household responsibilities, skills, exercise and social disparity, while the second shifts from public transport to productivity and family dissatisfaction. Some links are unclear, and “Longer weekend can create work-life balance” repeats an earlier point rather than advancing the argument. Group related ideas into focused paragraphs and make each transition show the precise relationship between claims. Clearer referencing would also help readers identify who “they” refers to in several sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “consumer demands,” “productivity,” “social disparity” and “work-life balance,” which allows you to discuss both employee and business concerns. There are also noticeable spelling and word-choice problems that reduce precision, such as “wrokplaces,” “houseld,” “tranport” and “flexibile.” Some combinations are unnatural or unclear: “work for longer weekends,” “strong sense of connectivity” and “working on expertise” do not express your intended meanings naturally. Repeated use of “benefit,” “time” and “work” also limits flexibility. Aim for accurate collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, describe employees as “working longer hours” and say they can “develop their skills.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex forms, including a concession clause (“While shorter weekend can be beneficial…”) and a conditional sentence (“If there is no balance…”). Meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors and punctuation problems remain. Examples include “Not only they will be able” (the auxiliary should precede the subject after “Not only”), “having sufficient time encourage them” (subject–verb agreement), and “there are highly chances” (incorrect construction). Articles and plurals also need attention in phrases such as “a significant amount of time” and “longer weekends.” Several sentences run together without a space after the full stop. Review inversion after negative adverbials, agreement, and article use, then proofread sentence boundaries to improve control while retaining your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.