Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The working week should be lesser and the workers should have extended weekend.

In my opinion, this notion is not a great idea because it can make a person feel lazy and with longer weekends the companies can face a deal of loss. At the same time working more than five days a week can cause mental issues like depression or anxiety. At contrast, shorter working days can not be as productive as it should be and the employees will have lesser time to work which can badly effect the progress of the company.

On the one hand, this idea can prevent mentall illness and help employees to regain their energy and come back to work with much more energy and positivety. Pro long weekends can help people plan vacations will their families. Therefore, they will be able to spend quality time with their family and children. This time can allow the frustrated workers vent out their aggression and start with a positive and fresh mind. For instance, my colleague once complaint that she is unable to spend good time with her children which is created problems at her home and she is feeling distanced from her kids. This situation was very overwhelming for her and she was quite upset about it.

On the other hand, the same idea can result in the unproductivity of individuals because of which a company can loose their profit and may not be able to meet their deadlines. The workers can also feel lazy by getting use to working lesser and having an extended leisure time. Furthermore, the pay scale may be reduced to the lesser working days which will effect the people in terms of financial constrains. In addition, they can fail to pay their dues timely. For example, I remember one of my friend who was working part-time and she once mentioned that due to less working days she is not paid enough so that she can further support her family.

In a nutshell, I believe that working for lesser time can be very beneficial for majority of the people but one should be mindful about its drawback which can be greatly challenging specifically for larger families. Therefore, I firmly disagree that people should work for lesser days.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you ultimately disagree with a shorter working week, while acknowledging possible benefits such as improved mental health and family time. You address both sides and include relevant examples, including your colleague’s difficulty spending time with her children and your friend’s financial concerns. This covers the task well, and the conclusion returns to your view. However, the opening says the proposal “is not a great idea,” while much of the first supporting paragraph explains its benefits; the distinction between recognising benefits and disagreeing overall could be clearer. Some points, especially the claims about laziness, company losses and reduced pay, are asserted rather than fully explained. Develop the causal links and support the main reasons more evenly to make the argument more complete and convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting contrasting considerations, and a concluding position. Signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In a nutshell” help readers follow the broad organisation. However, the progression is not always smooth. The introduction moves between opposing claims, and the first body paragraph supports the benefits of longer weekends without clearly connecting them to your eventual disagreement. Some linking phrases are awkward or do not express the intended relationship, such as “At contrast” and “Therefore” before the family-time point. References such as “this idea” can also be vague. Make each paragraph’s main purpose explicit and use transitions that accurately show contrast, cause or result.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “mental issues,” “regain their energy,” “deadlines,” “profit,” and “financial” concerns. These choices allow you to discuss wellbeing, productivity and household pressures. However, several noticeable word-choice, collocation and spelling problems reduce precision: “lesser” is used where “shorter” or “fewer” is needed, “a deal of loss” is unnatural, and “unproductivity” is less idiomatic than “reduced productivity.” There are also errors such as “mentall,” “positivety,” “loose” for “lose,” and “constrains” for “constraints.” Some phrases, including “vent out their aggression,” do not fit the intended meaning naturally. Build accuracy by learning common word partnerships and checking spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, using clauses with “because,” “which,” and “that,” as well as contrastive structures. Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity and control. For example, “Pro long weekends can help people plan vacations will their families” has an incomplete construction, while “which is created problems” and “she is feeling distanced” show problems with verb form and tense. In “the same idea can result in the unproductivity of individuals because of which a company can loose their profit,” the clause structure and agreement are difficult to follow. Review verb forms, sentence boundaries and agreement, and simplify constructions when needed. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.