Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The days people work usually from monday to friday shiuld be shorter and weekend should be longer atleast more than two days I strongly agree with this statement because it allows workers to spend more time with their families and also reduces work pressure.

In my prespective,having shorter working week and longer weekend tends to help employee to focus on their families, it also helps to reduce stress and improve mental health and well being, some how employee will be less tried , may experience less burnout. for instance an employee working for a whole week with only two holidays will easily get mentally exhausted and there will be too much work pressure on him. additionally he will quit that job or cannot do any work properly.

Moreover, Due to longer weekend and shorter working week employee can become more motivated and do his best on job, and being more productive. In fact he will have a balanced and healthy life. addtionally he can spend more time doing other hobbies and personal activities.

In conclusion i would say that, the days people work should be shorter and weekend should be longer so employee get more motivated and productive and can spend more time with their families.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the opening: you strongly agree that the working week should be shorter and the weekend longer. You give relevant reasons, including more family time, reduced stress, better mental health and improved motivation. However, these points are mostly asserted rather than fully explained or supported; for example, the claim that workers may quit or perform poorly is not developed with a specific example. The response also does not meet the required minimum of 250 words, so there is limited space to explore the effects or consider how a shorter week could work. To strengthen the response, develop each main reason with a clear explanation and a relevant example, while maintaining your position throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The ideas generally progress from family and wellbeing benefits to motivation and productivity, and linking phrases such as “Moreover” and “In conclusion” help signal this movement. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. In the first body paragraph, several ideas are joined in a long sequence, making the relationship between reduced stress, exhaustion and quitting difficult to follow. The conclusion also repeats the opening rather than drawing together the main reasons. Use clearer sentence boundaries and organise each paragraph around one main point, followed by explanation and an example. This would make the progression easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “work pressure,” “burnout,” “productive,” “motivated” and “personal activities.” These choices communicate the main ideas, but the range is limited and several expressions are inaccurate or awkward, such as “less tried” and “focus on their families.” Spelling and word-form errors, including “prespective,” “addtionally” and “well being,” also reduce accuracy and can distract the reader. Aim to use a wider range of precise work-and-wellbeing vocabulary, and check spelling and collocations carefully. For instance, describing employees as “less exhausted” or “less prone to burnout” would express your intended meaning more naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause with “because” and a conditional example beginning “if an employee…”. However, complex sentences are often not controlled successfully. The opening is a run-on sentence, and the first body paragraph joins several independent ideas with commas. There are also recurring problems with articles, agreement and sentence boundaries, as in “employee can become more motivated” and “In conclusion i would say that, the days…”. These errors sometimes make the relationships between ideas harder to understand. Practise writing shorter, complete sentences first, then combine them with accurate conjunctions. Check singular and plural forms, articles, capitalisation and punctuation during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.