Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is important for everyone, including young people, to save money for their future.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

Saving money to secure future is crucial for every people, I completely agree with this motive. First of all, preserving financial ability provides individuals more self-confidence, valid satisfaction and secured social life. This ability is allowed people convinient though, it also concern about their trend to laziness. The citizens who are earning money from their full-time job or having the existance sources of money, for instance, their workflow enhanced and more organised rather than those, whose have the lack of sufficent wealth. It might the consequenses of not only monthly salary but also the savings money for their future and the another reason is public reputation. Research says, human as a sociable beings they have expections from the society that public care about them who has well solvency such as the latest generaion is the victim of this aspacts; for example, in southest asia the several number of graduate persons who recently appointed a office are merely concern their future because of savings, how they do something for their inheritages. However, savings money is also the reason of making young people idle.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response only partially addresses the task. While you clearly state that you agree with the statement, the length requirement has not been met, as the response contains only 182 words, falling significantly short of the 250-word minimum. The ideas presented regarding self-confidence, social life, and young people becoming idle are limited and under-developed. For instance, the discussion on how savings affect young people's workflow or reputation remains vague and lacks sufficient extension or specific, well-supported examples from your own experience. To move up to a higher band, you need to write at least 250 words and fully develop your main ideas with detailed explanations and clearer supporting examples throughout the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

The response shows some basic organisation, but there is no clear overall progression of ideas. While you attempt to use transitional markers such as 'First of all' and 'However', the overall arrangement lacks logical coherence. The paragraphing is insufficient, as almost the entire essay is lumped into a single block of text rather than being divided into a proper introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Furthermore, referencing is frequently unclear, making it difficult to follow the progression of your thoughts—for example, phrases like 'This ability is allowed people convinient though, it also concern about their trend to laziness' create confusion rather than seamless connection. To improve, you should organise your writing into distinct paragraphs and ensure that cohesive devices are used accurately to link your ideas logically.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for expressing basic thoughts, but noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling cause some difficulty for the reader. Examples of these inaccuracies include phrases like 'secure future is crucial for every people', 'convinient though', 'existance sources', and 'southest asia'. You also attempt some less common items such as 'solvency' and 'inheritages', but inappropriate collocations and word forms hinder clarity. Additionally, there are awkward expressions like 'graduate persons who recently appointed a office'. To achieve a higher band, you need to expand your lexical range and use vocabulary with greater precision, paying closer attention to standard collocations, word forms, and accurate spelling.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a limited range of structures, relying mostly on simple or faulty complex sentences. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text that cause difficulty for the reader, including issues with verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions. Examples include 'this ability is allowed people', 'whose have the lack of sufficent wealth', 'human as a sociable beings they have expections', and 'who has well solvency such as the latest generaion is the victim'. Punctuation control is also weak, resulting in run-on sentences and comma splices, such as joining independent clauses without appropriate conjunctions or full stops. To improve your grammar score, you should focus on reducing frequent errors by strengthening your control over basic sentence patterns, plurals, articles, and verb tenses before attempting more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.