Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The chart provides data about the youngesters attending dance classes based on location and types in a town in Australia.

Overall, Private studios was the most dominant portion in chart. Ballet and modern dances were popular in specific age group. While, there was a least contibution of youngsters in college based studios.

Initially, on the bases of location, students attended classes in significant number at private studios that accounted for 48%. This is followed by school halls that included 24% contibution.

On the contrary, Community halls and college based studios were least used for classes. The proportion included 18% and 10% respectively. The proportion was categorized on the basis of types of different dance classes in particular age group. The students under eleven years of age attended ballet classes mostly. The number was significant around 600 students. The same age attended Tap classes that accounted for 400 students. On the contrary, modern classes contirbution was least in terms of attendence of students accounted for 300. The group about 11 to 16 years of age attended modern classes in significant proportion that accounted for 500 students. Therefore, the ballet and tap classes were least attended by this group.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both charts and provide a clear overall summary, identifying private studios as the leading location and college-based studios as the least used. You also make relevant age-group comparisons, including the under-11 group’s preference for ballet and the older group’s high modern-class attendance. This addresses the task well, though some details are incomplete or inaccurate: under-11 tap attendance is about 450, not 400, and the 11–16 group’s ballet and tap figures (about 300 and 420) are not reported. The claim that ballet and tap were both least attended by this group is also too broad, since tap slightly exceeded ballet. More precise coverage of these comparisons would make the report more fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs describing the location and age-group data. This gives the reader a coherent route through both charts. However, progression is sometimes weakened by mechanical or unclear linking, such as “Initially” and “On the contrary,” where a straightforward comparison would be more natural. The sentence beginning “The proportion was categorized…” shifts abruptly from locations to dance types, and “Therefore” does not clearly follow from the preceding figures. Grouping the age data into a direct comparison of the two age groups, and using clearer references and transitions, would make the organisation more fluent and cohesive.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “accounted for,” “proportion,” “attended,” and “significant,” and the meaning is generally understandable. There is some attempt to vary expression, but several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing data: “most dominant portion,” “least contribution of youngsters,” and “classes in significant number” do not express the comparisons precisely. Spelling errors such as “youngesters,” “contibution,” “contirbution,” and “attendence” also reduce accuracy. Aim for standard collocations such as “largest share,” “lowest proportion,” and “the number of students attending,” and check spelling carefully. This would make the vocabulary more precise and reliable.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, and most of the data remains understandable. However, some grammatical errors recur in agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “Private studios was” should be “Private studios were,” while “the most dominant portion in chart” needs an article and a more suitable structure. “While, there was a least…” is an incomplete or awkwardly punctuated clause, and “The same age attended Tap classes” does not form a clear grammatical comparison. There are also long sentences where clauses are joined without clear control. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and complete clause structures, and use punctuation to separate comparisons cleanly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.