Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In present tiem many nations , costomers can more willing to go to a supermarket and perches food products all over the world.

On yhe one hand, Many people argue that buying international food is very positive think for businessmen and government. for example, if pupils whould like to buy iported food such as foreign fruits as result small farmers and businessman should earn higher money and they should extend their business. also inporat export allows to increase the country economies . Moreover its also provide a wide variety of food in different nations such as avocado, lichi and grapes.

On the other hand, Many people believe in buy international food in super markets has several negative poonts. Firstly, people often go for shopping in big or expensive supermarket therefore many small shops and locals has face critical situation. for instance , if idividuals continually buying food in super market and buy international food as a result many local businessman should have loss and people forget their nations food items. secondly, supermarket also acquired large number of land where allready have land shortage. and it's cause traffic in urban areas. lastly supermarket often provide a comfottable place therefore many people spend their valueble time without knowing how much spent they time in side the mart.

in conclusion , think it has both negative or positive point However it is more beneficial for countries so in my opinion costomer should go to a supermarket and buy food products all over the world.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address the question and give a clear overall view: although you discuss disadvantages, your conclusion says that buying food from around the world is “more beneficial.” The response includes relevant points about business opportunities, food variety, pressure on local shops, and land use. However, some ideas are not fully explained or are only loosely connected to the question. For example, the claim that supermarkets cause traffic and make people spend too much time shopping needs a clearer link to the availability of imported food. Develop the strongest points with a specific explanation or example, and make sure each body paragraph directly evaluates this development rather than supermarkets in general.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “in conclusion” help readers follow the broad direction of the argument. However, the progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the discussion moves from local businesses to land shortages, traffic, and shopping time without showing how these points connect. Some linking is also mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “for example,” “as a result,” and “also.” Group related ideas more carefully, use clearer references to show what “it” or “this” means, and build each paragraph around one main point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “international food,” “wide variety,” “local businessman,” and “land shortage.” This gives you enough language to communicate the main argument, but spelling errors and inaccurate word choices are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include “costomers,” “perches,” “inporat export,” and “comfottable.” Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “earn higher money” and “positive think.” Work on accurate spelling and common collocations, and choose more precise terms—for instance, distinguish between imported food, international trade, and supermarket shopping. A wider range of accurately used topic vocabulary would make your ideas clearer and more convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple statements and attempts at longer sentences, including clauses introduced by “if” and “therefore.” This shows some range, but control is inconsistent, especially in complex sentences. For example, “if pupils whould like to buy iported food … small farmers and businessman should earn” has unclear clause structure and verb choices, while “many small shops and locals has face” has problems with agreement and verb formation. Articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries also need attention. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a clearly formed supporting clause, then check subject–verb agreement and verb tense. More reliable control of these patterns would make your argument easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.