Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Increasingly, people are questioning whether buying food that is produced in all over the world, is a positive or negative development. From my perspective, I completely agree with this statement that consumers should buy food which is produced in all over the world. This essay will discuss the positive side of this trend.
When consumers buy food which is produced all over the world, it has several advantages. Firstly, consumers will get a diverse variety of food. Some countries produce one variety of vegetables while others produce another type of vegetables and fruits. Secondly, it will help consumers to consume best quality of food. when different countries produce same vegetables and fruits, then they will compete with each other and try to give economical and better quality food. For instance, India imports different types of food products from different countries which allow their citizens to consume best quality and healthier food.
Similarly, when consumers consume foods from all over the world, then governments imports different variety of food from different countries of world. It gives a chance to local farmers from different countries to sell their products and make money. Nowadays, many 3rd world countries and their people are dependant on agriculture. For example, Pakistan is an agricultural country and it depends on the export of their agricultural products like rice, wheat etc.
To conclude this essay, Although some people may think that consuming food that is produced all over the world is bad, I firmly believe that it is a very good development. It gives a choice to the consumer. It also provide a financial help to local farmers.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
Your position is clear: you consider worldwide food availability a positive development, and you give relevant reasons, including greater choice, competition that may improve quality, and income opportunities for farmers. The examples of India and Pakistan help connect the discussion to real contexts. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the link between importing food and helping “local farmers from different countries” is not made precise, and the Pakistan example concerns agricultural exports without clearly showing how supermarket access to imported food benefits those farmers. Develop each main reason with a clearer explanation of how it supports your view, and acknowledge a relevant drawback before explaining why the benefits outweigh it.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The ideas generally progress from consumer benefits to possible benefits for producers, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “To conclude” make the organisation easy to follow. However, the linking can feel mechanical, particularly through repeated openings such as “When consumers…” and “Similarly.” The relationship between the second body paragraph’s claim about farmers and its Pakistan example is also not fully clear. Use a wider range of transitions that show the precise relationship between ideas, and make each paragraph’s central point explicit. Clearer links between examples and claims would make the overall progression more convincing.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “diverse variety,” “compete,” “agricultural products,” and “consumer.” Some attempts at more specific language are useful, but several choices or combinations are unnatural or imprecise, such as “consume best quality of food,” “economical and better quality food,” and “financial help to local farmers.” Repetition of “food,” “different,” and “countries” also limits flexibility. Aim for more natural collocations and precise wording, for example, describing a wider selection, affordable prices, or income for farmers. This would make your argument sound more fluent and exact while preserving the clear meaning of your current vocabulary.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional-style clauses beginning “When consumers buy food…” and a relative clause in “food which is produced…”. The main ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “produced in all over the world” has an incorrect preposition, “governments imports” has subject–verb disagreement, and “It also provide” should agree with its subject. There are also issues with articles and sentence punctuation, as in “consume best quality” and the lowercase “when” after a full stop. Check agreement, article use, and sentence boundaries carefully, and revise complex sentences to ensure their clauses are grammatically complete.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.