Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some argue that a number of countries provide ability to buy world-wide food produced from local supermarkets. I firmly believe that it is a positive development because it leads to people get to taste food overseas without travelling and the nutrient value of having different food varieties.

Nowadays, a lot of supermarkets tend to sell food from overseas because of the demand from the consumers. Development of internet significantly influence most of the cravings. Therefore, supermarkets are importing food from oversea to satisfy the customer needs. For instance, While I was in the UK, I met a lot people who haven't left the country. However, they have a vast knowledge about food from other countries. It is due to the supermarkets have dedicated aisles for world-wide food. Therefore, someone to taste an Italian pizza, they do not have to travel Italy. It is a financial benefit to the customer and a great opportunity to taste the food all over the world.

A supermarket importing a new food from other country need to be approved by the government agencies. They evaluate the nutrient value of the food before the approval. Therefore, consuming food from other nations not only give someone new experiences, it also provide significant nutrient value. For example, Sri Lanka import dates from Arabic countries under the condition that it is the highest quality dates on the market. Therefore, government intervention help supermarkets to sell highest quality oversea products that benefit citizen with nutrients.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that supermarkets selling oversea products help consumers to taste other countries food and it adds nutrient value to their pallet.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you consider worldwide food availability positive. You address the question with two relevant reasons—access to international cuisine without travelling and the nutritional value of imported foods—and support them with examples from the UK and Sri Lanka. This meets the task well, and the personal example helps make the first point concrete. However, the nutrition argument is less fully explained: government approval and quality checks do not by themselves show that imported food offers greater nutritional value. The claim that it adds “nutrient value” to consumers’ diets needs a clearer explanation or a specific example of nutritional variety. Developing this point and linking each example more directly to your reasons would make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present supporting reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. The examples are placed in relevant paragraphs, so the reader can follow the main line of argument. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, particularly through repeated use of “Therefore” and “For instance.” Some links also do not clearly express the relationship between ideas; for example, the move from government approval to nutritional benefits needs an explicit explanation. Referencing is occasionally unclear, as in “Therefore, someone to taste an Italian pizza,” where the connection to the preceding sentence is difficult to follow. Use a wider range of linking methods and make the logical relationship between claims and examples more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough vocabulary to discuss the topic and attempt some less common expressions, including “nutrient value,” “dedicated aisles,” and “government intervention.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision: “provide ability,” “cravings,” “customer needs,” and “adds nutrient value to their pallet” do not express your ideas naturally. “Oversea” and “world-wide” are also used inconsistently; “overseas” and “international” would be more appropriate in these contexts. These choices do not prevent the reader from understanding your overall position, but they sometimes make individual claims harder to interpret. Focus on accurate collocations and use topic vocabulary such as “food imports,” “dietary variety,” and “nutritional benefits” precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses beginning with “because” and “because of,” and the overall meaning is generally understandable. Some grammatical errors remain, especially with verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “it leads to people get to taste” should use an infinitive or gerund, while “Development of internet significantly influence” needs an article and subject–verb agreement. In “A supermarket importing a new food … need to be approved,” the subject and verb pattern are faulty, and “consuming food … not only give … it also provide” has agreement errors. Capitalisation and punctuation are also inconsistent, as in “While” after “For instance.” Review these patterns and proofread complex sentences while retaining your attempts at varied structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.