Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowdays, people can easily visit the supermarket and buy food products frrom different countries around the world.This has become very popular in our country.In my opinion,this is positive development because it give customers a more of choices and helps improve international trade.

Firstly,buying food from different countries provides customers a variety of choices.People can enjoy the taste of different kinds of food.For example,If you live in pakistan you can buy apples from chine,dates from saudia arabia and chocolates from switzerland. This allows consumers to enjoy different kinds of food that are not available in our country.Secondly,international food trade supports the food economy.It gave the business opportunities and provides Employment for many people.Farmers and food productorscan sell their food from different countries to earn money.Importing food can be very helpfull because when a country faces a shortage of food products because of bad weather or natural disaster.

However,there are some disadvantages of transporting food as well.Transporting food over large distances can increase pollution because of ships, trucks and aeroplans produce harmful gases.In Addition ,imported food can somethings be more expansive than locally produced food.It can creates difficulties for farmers who have to compete with international companies.

In conclusion,buying food products from different countries provides different choices but still it have some disadvantages.In my opinion,overall it is positive development.It gives consumers more choices,supports international trade and allows people to enjoy different food from different countries.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you consider worldwide food availability positive, while acknowledging pollution and competition for local farmers. You give relevant reasons, including greater consumer choice, trade and employment, and support one point with examples such as apples from China and dates from Saudi Arabia. However, several ideas are only briefly explained. For instance, the claim that imports create employment is not developed, and the food-shortage point ends without explaining how imports help. The conclusion repeats the main view rather than adding a final insight. The response is also 17 words below the required minimum, so there is less space to develop and support your arguments. Explain the effects of each reason more fully and add a specific example or explanation to complete the discussion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting benefits, a paragraph on disadvantages, and a conclusion. Sequencing is generally easy to follow, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help show the direction of the argument. At times, though, the linking feels mechanical, and some connections between ideas are unclear. The sentence beginning “Importing food can be very helpful because…” does not complete its explanation, while the shift from employment to food shortages is abrupt. There are also run-together sentences where spaces after full stops are missing, which makes the progression harder to read. Use clearer links between each claim and its explanation, and ensure each paragraph develops one connected line of reasoning.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “international trade,” “food economy,” “shortage,” “pollution,” and “compete.” The examples of foods and countries also make the discussion concrete. However, the range is somewhat limited, and several spelling and word-choice errors reduce accuracy: “frrom,” “chine,” “saudia arabia,” “productorscan,” “helpfull,” and “expansive” are examples. Some expressions are also imprecise, such as “a more of choices” and “supports the food economy.” Aim for accurate spelling and more natural collocations, such as “a wider range of choices” and “supports the agricultural sector.” This would make your ideas clearer and help you express economic and environmental effects more precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use mostly straightforward sentence patterns, with some attempts to combine ideas using “because,” “when,” and relative clauses. The overall meaning is usually understandable, but errors in sentence structure and grammatical forms occur across the response. For example, “it give customers” needs subject–verb agreement, and “it can creates difficulties” combines a modal with an incorrect verb form. The clause “because of ships, trucks and aeroplans produce harmful gases” is also structurally faulty: after “because of,” use a noun phrase, or use “because” with a full clause. Articles and sentence boundaries need attention too, as in “this is positive development” and the run-on spacing after full stops. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then build more varied complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.