Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent years, people can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world. I believe that this is a positive development because it is very convienent and also inexpensive.

The main reason is that, it is very easy and convinient for the consumers to buy anything. This is because in the past people used to travel a lot to buy something important. This took them many days to got the thing they wanted to buy.

For example, in past if anyone needed to buy any important thing for their home, which is not present in their country. They might have needed to travel a lot to just buy that thing. Therefore, this develpment has made it very easy to buy anything from around the world.

Another important reason is that, this development has also made it inexpensive to buy anything produced around the world. This is because supermarkets have a lot of resources. They can buy anything from around the world in large quantities. which leads to less expense overall per product.This makes products cheaper for consumers. For example, if a person wants to buy pink salt, he can easily go to supermarket to buy it , which would be relativly inexpensive compared to traveling another country to buy it. As a result, it is a lot chepaer nowadays to buy anything produced around the world.

In conclusion, I believe that comsumers being able to buy anything from the supermarket, which was produced all over the world is a positive development. This is because it is a lot cheaper and also very convienient.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you consider worldwide supermarket food a positive development, mainly because it is convenient and inexpensive. Both reasons are relevant, and the examples of buying an unavailable household item and pink salt help illustrate them. However, the response only partly develops the task: the first example focuses on travelling to obtain an important item generally, rather than explaining the benefits of accessing food from other countries. The claim that supermarkets’ resources make imported products cheaper also needs clearer explanation or support. To strengthen the response, focus each paragraph specifically on international food availability and extend the reasoning with a concrete food-related example. The conclusion restates your view but adds no further insight.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a recognisable overall arrangement: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. This makes your main line of argument easy to follow. You also use linking expressions such as “For example,” “Therefore,” and “As a result” to show relationships between ideas. However, these transitions are sometimes mechanical or repetitive, and the connection between some examples and the topic is not always clear. For instance, the first body paragraph shifts from international food to buying an important household item. There are also awkward breaks in “which leads to less expense overall per product,” where the clause is separated from the preceding sentence. Use clearer links between claims and evidence, and make sure each paragraph progresses directly from the topic sentence to a relevant explanation and example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your basic argument, including “consumers,” “supermarkets,” “produced around the world,” and “inexpensive.” However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, especially “buy anything,” “very easy,” and “around the world.” Some choices are imprecise or unnatural: “a lot of resources” does not clearly express the supermarkets’ purchasing advantage, while “traveling another country” is not an idiomatic way to describe the comparison. Spelling errors such as “convienent,” “develpment,” “relativly,” “chepaer,” and “comsumers” are noticeable. Build a more precise range for discussing imported food, prices, and availability, and proofread spelling. For example, “buy anything” could become “purchase a wide range of imported foods.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including explanations with “because” and a relative clause beginning “which.” The main ideas remain understandable, but control is uneven, and errors in sentence construction and punctuation sometimes make the reader pause. For example, “This took them many days to got the thing” uses an incorrect verb form; after “to,” use the base form. “In past if anyone needed…” is missing an article, and “which leads to less expense overall per product” is an incomplete sentence when separated by a full stop. There are also comma problems, such as the comma after “reason is that.” Practise accurate complex sentences and check that every clause forms a complete sentence, with consistent verb forms and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.