Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In some countries nowadays, buyers can go to a supermarket and can purchase international food. In my opinion, its a positive development because now everyone can try variety of food and can enjoy multiple taste of different nations.

One of the main advantages is that, now everyone can have international cuisine etxperience. It helps people to eat meals of their favourite countries such as china and india without travelling abroad. For example, a person who is willing is try chinese chilli dry by watching movies can now actually try it in his local area. Furthermore, this also influences the cultural signifance of the countries and also it keep touches the person with that country deeply. Therefore, it allows individuals to have a international experience in their living area.

Another positive aspect would be the food business. Promoting the food brand in another countries for better oppurtunities and good future. For example, famous pizza brand of pakistan naming Cheezious recently opened at U.K and it went very successful. Moreover, it could enhance the image of a country in different backgrounds. Like, if it the food from a particular country tastes food we say something good for it. As a result, it allows to promote food trade internationally and also builds reputation of a nation by trying its meals.

In conclusion, I believe the availability of international food in supermarket is a positive development. It not only allows people to taste variety of cuisine but also to strengthen the international trade and food bussiness.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion: you consider worldwide food availability positive. You address the question with two relevant reasons—giving consumers access to other cuisines and supporting international food businesses—and provide examples, including trying Chinese food locally and a Pakistani pizza brand opening in the UK. This covers the task well. However, the cultural point that international food “keep touches the person with that country deeply” is unclear, and the business argument is less fully explained: the link between a brand’s success and broader benefits to consumers or countries needs more support. Develop each example with a clearer explanation of how it demonstrates your claim, and make the cultural benefit more precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate benefits, and a conclusion that restates your view. Signposting such as “One of the main advantages,” “Another positive aspect,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the progression. The ideas within paragraphs are generally relevant, but some connections are mechanical or unclear. For instance, “Furthermore” introduces the cultural-significance point without explaining its relationship to the preceding example, while “Like, if it the food from a particular country tastes food…” interrupts the business argument. Use linking phrases only where the relationship is clear, and organise each paragraph around a claim followed by explanation and a well-connected example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “international cuisine,” “cultural significance,” “food trade,” and “reputation.” There are also attempts at less common expressions, but inaccurate spelling, word forms, and collocations make the range less controlled. Examples include “etxperience,” “oppurtunities,” “bussiness,” and “keep touches”; phrases such as “multiple taste” and “food brand in another countries” are also unnatural or imprecise. These issues sometimes make the reader pause, although your overall meaning remains understandable. Check spelling carefully and learn common word partnerships as complete phrases. More precise terms for the benefits you discuss would help you express ideas clearly and naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause with “because” and a relative clause in “a person who is willing…”. However, control is inconsistent, and faulty sentence construction is frequent enough to affect clarity. For example, “Promoting the food brand in another countries for better opportunities and good future” is a fragment, while “it keep touches the person” has errors in verb form and sentence structure. There are also problems with articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries, as in “a international experience” and “it went very successful.” Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, then check agreement and articles. Aim for accurate complex sentences rather than adding complexity before the basic structure is secure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.