Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Export and inport business have changed the landcape of locally cultured food, where things no longer isolated and keep traveling globally, each showroom and wholeseller have multi nationality food and items. However, this has led to an arguement in society that some believe it has several benefits, while others more concerned about the negative sides.
Nowadays almost every developed country have showrooms and supermarket mega stores, people can buy everything under one roof because this saves the time and offer variety of food options. Furthermore, locally grown crops are not limited to locals only it travels all around the world, it boosts the economy and significantly increased the employment. Despite this, people can taste world wide manufactured food and add them in their day to day life if suit them.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0
The response suffers from a severe length penalty, containing only 130 words compared to the minimum requirement of 250 words. Because of this, the task is only partially addressed and the arguments cannot be fully developed. The student touches upon the benefits of global food trade such as time-saving, variety, and economic boosting, but fails to clearly state or defend an overall position on whether this is a positive or negative development, merely noting that an argument exists in society. Due to the significant under-length issue and underdeveloped ideas, this falls under Band 4.0 descriptors.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay is divided into an introduction and a single body paragraph, but the paragraphing lacks sufficient development. There is some attempt at logical organization, transitioning from introduction to benefits, but the progression is disjointed. Cohesive devices are basic and sometimes faulty, for instance using 'Despite this' inappropriately when introducing further supporting points rather than a contrast. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as 'if suit them' leaving the subject ambiguous. Overall organization shows basic structure, aligning with a Band 5.0 score.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is limited and contains frequent word choice and spelling errors that impede communication at times. Examples include 'inport' instead of import, 'landcape' for landscape, 'wholeseller' for wholesaler, and 'multi nationality' instead of multinational. While the student attempts some less common vocabulary like 'showrooms', 'mega stores', and 'globally', the execution is inaccurate. The range is minimally adequate for basic communication, but persistent lexical errors place this at Band 4.5, rounded to 5.0 for the presence of relevant topic-related terms.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The writing demonstrates a mix of simple and attempted complex sentence structures, but control is weak. There are numerous grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('every developed country have'), run-on sentences ('where things no longer isolated and keep traveling globally'), and missing prepositions or articles. Punctuation is also problematic, with comma splices linking independent clauses. Although meaning can generally be deciphered, frequent structural errors and lack of error-free sentences restrict the score to Band 4.5, rounded to 5.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.