Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

At present day, in many nations users could go to a superstore and purchase daily need products produced all over the world. From my perspective, it creates a crucial role for of communities like it supports economically and great excess to products from all over the world.

To commence with, in various states like Germany, USA, United Kingdom and Luxembourg users went to the market and purchase anything they want while, if they did not want to go which now possible you buy everything online and you will receive at your door step. For instance, two weeks ago, I bought an iphone 17 pro max from a grocery market near to my domestic unit however, it was not possible around 10 years ago. Similarly, its a great achievement of our authorities that minimize your access to everything you want.

Furthermore, it develops a dedicative impact on your society like several individuals of America like to eat Mangoes yet, due to the cold the growth of mangoes trees in America is not possible thus, they import it from the Asian countries like Pakistan and India. Therefore, I strongly with notion it is a positive development. In addition to this, with this development various jobs have been seen in the import export sector. Therefore, Nowadays, public are happy with this development they purchase any item from all over world with only few steps walk.

In conclusion, at present day many citizens are satisfied with the development or easy access of food items all over the world while, it is very challenging if we consider about few years later.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The student attempts to address the prompt by expressing a clear position that global food availability is a positive development. Ideas are introduced regarding economic support, international trade, and the availability of out-of-season items, such as importing mangoes to the USA from Asia. However, the development of these ideas is limited and somewhat superficial. For instance, the example provided about purchasing an iPhone 17 Pro Max from a grocery market is irrelevant to the core topic of food production and global consumption. Furthermore, the reasoning tends to be repetitive, and the final paragraph introduces a vague concluding thought about future challenges without clear elaboration. Therefore, the response aligns best with a Band 5 descriptor for partially addressing the task with limited idea development.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response is organised into paragraphs, beginning with an introduction, followed by body paragraphs, and a brief conclusion. However, the logical progression is frequently disrupted by awkward transitions and confusing sentence structures, such as "To commence with, in various states like Germany, USA... users went to the market and purchase anything they want while, if they did not want to go which now possible..." Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or inaccurately, and referencing is sometimes unclear, making it difficult to follow the flow of arguments. Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal logical links within paragraphs are weak. These features place the response firmly in the Band 5 category for coherence and cohesion.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The student uses a limited and occasionally inappropriate range of vocabulary. While there are some attempts to use less common items such as "import export sector" and "dedicative impact," these are often misused or unnatural in context. There are notable lexical and collocational errors throughout the text, including "users" instead of "consumers", "daily need products", "great excess to products", and "domestic unit" instead of home. Although the meaning is usually retrievable despite these inaccuracies, the restricted range and frequent word choice errors indicate a Band 5 performance for lexical resource.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, and attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in tense consistency, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions, such as "it creates a crucial role for of communities", "users went to the market and purchase", and "I strongly with notion". Punctuation is also problematic, with run-on sentences and missing commas creating confusion. These frequent errors cause significant difficulty for the reader and prevent the text from achieving a higher band, placing it at a Band 5 level.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.