Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

It is an undeniable fact that in many countries nowadays, consumers can easily get acces of buying foods that are produced all over the world with the help of supermarket's available nearby there house, by the help of food traders all over the globe supermarket's can get food produced all over the world. Nowadays in many countries access of food produced all over the globe and consumed by the help of supermarkets are having some positive and negetive development's globally which will be discussed in the following paragraph's

To begin with, the consumers getting access to food produced all over the globe with the help of supermarket is a positive development following that, it gives sufficiant amount of business to all the producers around the globe by providing different types of food to people in many countries after that, people get to experience variety of food that are produced only in a specific country because of the climatic changes likewise, food produced in cold weather and in warm weather are different further more, supermarket located in a cold country can now get access to food that is produced in warm country besides, this are some positive development's of consuming the food produced all over the world with the help of supermarket's.

On the other hand there are some negetive development's because in many countries nowadays, consumers are more likely to buy food produced by different countries and the local farmers are facing lose of business which is leading to spoiling of food produced by farmers.

Taking everything into consideration, there are positive as well as negetive development's by imported food also providing business for dealers all over the world but it give's a negetive impact to farmers which makes it positive and negetive and should be balanced equally.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both the positive and negative developments of consuming globally produced food, fulfilling the core task requirements. However, the development of ideas is limited and repetitive. The introduction simply restates the prompt multiple times using run-on structures, and the body paragraphs rely on generic arguments without deep elaboration or concrete examples. For instance, the discussion on local farmers facing losses is briefly stated without exploring broader economic or cultural implications. The position is somewhat clear, but the overall lack of fully extended ideas places this performance in the Band 5 range, as the response addresses the task only partially and lacks depth.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

The text demonstrates some organisation with basic paragraphing, separating the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, there is a distinct lack of clear progression and logical flow, driven primarily by severe punctuation and sentence-boundary issues. The entire first body paragraph, for example, consists of a single massive, rambling sentence stitched together by commas and repetitive transitional phrases like 'likewise', 'further more', and 'besides'. Cohesive devices are used awkwardly and repetitively, and referencing is often unclear. There is no clear overall progression of argument, which is characteristic of the Band 4 level of coherence and cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic, repetitive, and heavily relies on words directly lifted from the prompt, such as 'supermarket', 'food produced all over the world', and 'consumers'. There are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the essay, including 'acces' instead of access, 'sufficiant' instead of sufficient, 'negetive' instead of negative, and 'lose' instead of loss. These errors and the limited range of vocabulary cause some difficulty for the reader and indicate a minimally adequate range that struggles to convey precise meaning, firmly aligning with Band 5 descriptors.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

The grammatical structure of the essay is severely impaired by a lack of proper punctuation, resulting in prolonged run-on sentences. The response lacks control over complex sentence forms, relying on endless coordination and clauses joined incorrectly by commas rather than full stops or appropriate subordinating conjunctions. There are frequent errors in basic grammar, word formation, and punctuation that cause significant difficulty for the reader and obscure meaning. Although simple structures occasionally appear, the high frequency of serious grammatical errors means the response falls below the Band 5 threshold, meriting a Band 4.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.