Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

The growing influence can go to a supermarket and buy food produced has sparked various debates This issue is particularly significants because its impact affects individuals communities in multiple ways. In this essay, I will discuss positive and negative aspects of consumers the countries and their implication for society.

First of the hand, some countires not a grown the food is that its promotes access to wide range of opportunities.This is also evident from the fact, some countries has a apeal pakistan provide a vegetarian, foods and fruits. They are many benefits pakistan economy growth and countries people very happy tolerance, understanding, problem-solving methods. As shown various studies, benefits government has a provide new jobs better education but also government should be provide better education but countries has growth very high in other countries has had a profound social harmony.

On the end hand, negative effect on the countries as a government should a provide better foods, vegetarian, fruits, and other of better food provide rich countires. Pakistan government should not a provide better foods. The produced a other countries foods basically budget high level ship accident waste of money. Provide a better jobs as drivers truks ships and other drive jobs labour jobs.

In coclusion, around the world buy a foods many enviroments problems both provide signicant advantages notable challenges, on how effectively it is managed for society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0

The response sits at this low band because it only partially addresses the task. Furthermore, the length requirement is not met, as the response contains only 229 words, falling short of the 250-word minimum. The writer attempts to discuss both positive and negative aspects of global food supply in supermarkets, but the ideas are extremely limited, highly repetitive, and largely underdeveloped. The position remains unclear throughout the essay due to disjointed statements and confused arguments regarding countries like Pakistan, vegetarian foods, and transportation. Main ideas lack clear supporting examples or coherent explanations, resulting in a minimal and fragmented response to the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The essay displays basic organizational features, but there is a lack of clear overall progression. Although paragraph breaks are attempted to separate different points, the internal structure of these paragraphs is highly confusing and lacks logical sequencing. Cohesive devices are used mechanically and inaccurately, such as 'First of the hand' and 'On the end hand', which fail to signal relationships between ideas effectively. Referencing is frequently unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the train of thought. Information and ideas jump erratically between topics like economic growth, government responsibilities, and shipping logistics without smooth transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

Vocabulary use is limited and inadequate for effective communication, containing frequent errors that impede understanding. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'significants', 'implication', and 'tolerance', but demonstrates poor control over word form, spelling, and collocation. Repetitive phrasing such as 'better foods, vegetarian, fruits' occurs multiple times throughout the text. Word choice errors, including 'countires not a grown the food' and 'ship accident waste of money', severely restrict precision and cause considerable difficulty for the reader in grasping the intended meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The range of grammatical structures is very limited, consisting mostly of faulty attempts at complex sentences. Frequent errors in grammar, articles, plurals, verb forms, and sentence construction pervade the entire text. Examples of serious grammatical breakdown include 'some countries has a apeal pakistan provide a vegetarian, foods' and 'government should a provide better foods'. Subject-verb agreement is consistently problematic, and punctuation is poorly handled. These frequent errors cause continuous difficulty and strain for the reader, reflecting persistent weaknesses across basic syntactic patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.