Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent years, supermarkets in many countries offers food products which are produce in differents parts of the world. In some countries coustomers go to dig markets and purchase products all over the world. I believe that this is a positive develpoment i will discuss this trend in the upcoming paagraphs and provied a logical conclusion.

To commence with, there are several reasons associated with it. The first and foremost reason is, choice of wide varieties. To explain it, nowadays consumers can excess to a much varieties such as supermarkets sell different types of food like soft drinks, Korean noodles and japanies ingreadents without wasting travelling time and purchase from the local markets. Additionaly, it also gives several types of products to consumers. For example, a greater choice of experience different culture food which also increase the understanding between different culturs. Moreover, climate change and geographical limitation. To justify this, it also promotes good quality of products and it makes strong bond between countries. For instance, in India according to climate some fruits are not suitable to grow here such as, avocado and other certain berries which import from the other nations.

On the other hand, negative effects can not be ignored. There are numerous negative effects. The main point is, difficulties for local farmers and environments. To elaborate it, imported food which grow in a large scale no doubt this are cheaper but also make difficulties to local farmers. Moreover, transportation which contain that product such as trucks it consume considerable amount of fuel which produce large quantity of carbon emmision in air which leads to air pollution. Therefore, government should encourage local individuals to purchase items from the local markets. Nevertheless, it helps to reduce transportation expenses and pollution.

In conclusion, after taking all the aspects into consideration, I would like to emphaseze that it has some valid points. Although they can taste different types of food and increase the understanding between different heritage. However, it also make probems for local farmers to sell thair products in good price and it leads to rise in the pollution.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both the positive and negative aspects of consuming globally produced food, culminating in a clear overall position. The ideas presented are relevant, but some are under-developed or lack sufficient elaboration. For instance, the point regarding climate change and geographical limitations is introduced rather abruptly without fully explaining how importing goods creates a stronger bond between nations. Similarly, the conclusion introduces sentence fragments rather than fully synthesising the arguments. To reach a higher level, every main idea needs to be extended with well-reasoned explanations and fully supported examples, ensuring that no point feels brief or rushed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement and follows a clear paragraph structure, dividing the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion appropriately. Cohesive devices are used to guide the reader, such as 'To commence with', 'For example', and 'On the other hand'. However, referencing and transitions are sometimes mechanical or faulty, as seen in the slightly awkward signposting phrases like 'To justify this, it also promotes...' which disrupt the natural flow of ideas. Additionally, the progression within the second body paragraph stumbles slightly due to abrupt shifts between cultural understanding and climate limitations. Improving logical transitions and ensuring referencing is consistently clear will enhance the overall flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'geographical limitation', 'transportation expenses', and 'carbon emission'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word choice errors throughout the text, including 'coustomers', 'develpoment', 'paagraphs', 'provied', 'excess' instead of 'access', 'japanies', 'ingreadents', 'Additionaly', 'emphaseze', and 'thair'. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they highlight a limited control over word forms and spelling accuracy. To achieve a higher score, the writer must expand their lexical repertoire and eliminate recurring spelling mistakes by carefully checking their work.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response employs a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating an attempt to use varied structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors in verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and articles. Examples of these errors include 'supermarkets in many countries offers', 'which are produce', 'food which grow in a large scale', 'transportation which contain that product such as trucks it consume', and incomplete sentence structures such as 'Moreover, climate change and geographical limitation.' Punctuation errors also appear, particularly in the conclusion where clauses are left hanging as fragments. To improve, the writer needs to exercise better control over complex sentence patterns, ensure correct subject-verb agreement, and reduce basic grammatical slips.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.