Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Recently, in some countries of the world people can visit different grocery stores and purchase edible items which produce at different places of the world. Many critics consider it a positive development, but from my perspective, it is a negative trend because this practice make people especially youngsters reluctant from their culture. Besides, it can spred fatal viruses and diseases.

FIrst of all, if the public buy different food items which are not part of their culture it can increase the trend that people give priority to food related to the different country, and culture over their own food manufectured in their own country. Similarly, this will provoke society to leave their culture and adopt others. A small step of using the edidle items from different countries can manipulate the perspective of people, and they start to take their own things forgranted. Forexample, The latest survey in Pakistan finds out that society preffer europern style accomodation, cloths, and food, and accorting to the national inspection authority this trend was started from food. As a result, almost every household activity have the reflection of european traditions.

In addition, using edible imported products can spread different diseases and viruses. In many under developed countries the standards of food related items isnot good because companies it these countries always compromise on their standards just to make more profits. Most of food processing businesses are not even registered in the countries so they export sub standard products in different countries. For instance, in 2015 Japan have lost 2 billion dollars due to a disease spread out in orange farms througout the country, and the disease was spread due to oranges imported from India. Hence, they faced a considerable financial loss.

In summary, buying different items produced all over the world may have some benefits, but it have lot of the disadvantages. When people purchased different edile items they started to ignore their culture, and also it spread different diseases in both plants and humans.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position that globalized food supply is a negative development, supporting it with arguments regarding cultural erosion and health risks. However, the development of these ideas is uneven. For instance, the argument concerning cultural detachment is somewhat generalized, relying on a vague survey example from Pakistan without fully exploring the broader socio-economic mechanisms at play. Similarly, the example regarding Japan losing two billion dollars due to imported oranges from India lacks specific contextual verification typical of higher band responses. While the main stance is maintained throughout, certain supporting points remain under-developed or rely on sweeping assertions, placing this aspect of the writing solidly within the intermediate category.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear stance established in the introduction and reinforced in the conclusion. Paragraphing is used sufficiently to separate distinct arguments, such as cultural impact versus health hazards. However, cohesion at times feels mechanical or faulty due to repetitive transitional phrases and occasional referencing issues. For example, expressions like 'FIrst of all,' (with capitalization errors) and 'In addition,' are used rigidly rather than woven smoothly into the text. Furthermore, pronoun referencing occasionally lacks precision, such as when 'this' or 'they' refer back to broad clauses, creating minor bumps in the logical flow of information.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The writer displays an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'reluctant', 'manipulate the perspective', and 'sub standard'. Nevertheless, there are noticeable limitations and inaccuracies in word choice, collocation, and spelling that reflect an intermediate lexical control. Examples of awkward word choice and spelling slips include 'edible' misspelled as 'edidle', 'spread' spelled as 'spred', 'manufactured' spelled as 'manufectured', and phrases like 'compromise on their standards just to make more profits'. While these errors do not seriously impede overall communication, they prevent the writing from achieving a higher level of lexical precision and fluency.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting relative clauses and conditional structures. However, there are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation that surface throughout the text. These include issues with subject-verb agreement and verb forms, such as 'edible items which produce at different places' instead of 'produced', 'this practice make' instead of 'makes', 'the standards of food related items isnot good', and 'Japan have lost' instead of 'lost'. Additionally, punctuation and article usage show persistent flaws, such as 'Forexample, The latest survey'. While the meaning remains mostly clear to the reader, the density of these sentence-level errors restricts the score to an intermediate level.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.