Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In the contemporary socity food has become a matter of considerable debate. It is often argue that, in numerious internationals these days, costomers can go to a mart and perchase grub manufactured all over the globe. I am firmly agree with this view because individuals can get multiple type of fresh meal at one spot, and the cost of eating items passed by government.

One principal reason why i support this reason is that meal products can buy easily from supermarkets in fresh condition because there are many facilities were provided to stor food at specific tempreture for instance frezers were on every time to maintain the food items from the protection of bectrial arrest.In addition expiray dates are mentioned by food instructors, so that owners of markets can easily recognize the fresh food or damaged food.in a way they out the old food items and store fresh eating products.consequently costumers can easily get natural sustenance, demonstrating significant impact of diet.

Another compeling reason is that, customers can get natural food at the same price of meal that comes from all over the universe. In other words, prices are passed by government polices so that each market follow the rule that release by special admanistrators. Furthermore, it is easy to buy food because individuals do not need to debate regarding cost, in addition prices are already mentioned on eating products. As a result, consumers times cannot be waste during shoping or it leads toward the successful economy.

To sum up, i firmly belive that markets are benificial for every body beacause customers can easily buy food in fresh conditions or with actual prices. As a result coustmers do not need to waste their time on meaningless debates,that leasds toward positive impact on socities.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource4.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You give a clear positive position, stating that supermarkets let people obtain food conveniently and that prices are regulated. These points are relevant to the question, and the response has an introduction, supporting paragraphs and a conclusion. However, the task is only partly addressed because the central issue—access to food produced all over the world—is not explored in much detail. The discussion focuses instead on freshness, storage and pricing, with little explanation of how international food availability benefits consumers or what drawbacks it might have. Some claims, such as government policies setting prices across markets, are asserted rather than explained or supported with an example. Develop each reason more fully and connect it directly to the global availability of food.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an opening position, two body paragraphs presenting reasons, and a concluding summary. Signposting such as “One principal reason,” “Another compelling reason,” and “To sum up” helps readers follow the main stages. Within paragraphs, however, progression is sometimes mechanical or unclear. In the first body paragraph, the shift from refrigeration and expiry dates to “natural sustenance” is not fully explained; in the second, the link between regulated prices, saving shopping time and a “successful economy” is also difficult to follow. Some connectors, including “in addition” and “as a result,” are used without a clear logical relationship. Make the connection between each claim and its consequence explicit, and use referencing and transitions more precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “considerable debate,” “specific temperature,” “expiry dates,” and “government policies.” However, frequent spelling errors and inaccurate word choices make the vocabulary limited in effective control and sometimes slow understanding. Examples include “socity,” “numerious internationals,” “grub,” “bectrial arrest,” and “admanistrators.” Several expressions are also unnatural or imprecise: “the cost of eating items passed by government” and “customers times cannot be waste” do not communicate the intended ideas clearly. Aim for accurate, natural collocations rather than unusual wording, and check spelling carefully. More precise terms such as “imported food,” “food safety,” and “price regulations” would suit this topic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, including clauses introduced by “because,” “so that,” and “in addition.” Nevertheless, complex structures are often faulty, and frequent errors can make parts of the argument difficult to understand. For example, “I am firmly agree” has an incorrect verb pattern, while “meal products can buy easily” is missing a passive construction or a clear subject. Agreement and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “each market follow the rule” and the run-on sequence beginning “In addition expiray dates are mentioned.” Practise forming complete clauses, using consistent subject–verb agreement, and separating sentences with appropriate punctuation. Greater control of these basics will make your ideas clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.