Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In most of the countries, people purchases goods from supermarket becuase it provide availability of good that produced from all over the world. I firmly agree with this viewpoints because this development has an positive impact on the individuals lives. It can provide access easily and create more opportunites.

To begin with, Supermarket plays an essential role to improve the lives of the people. They provide opportunities to the individuals to purchase those good which is not easily available in their local market which help them to provide easy acces and reduce the travelling cost. As a result, it contributes to people save money and experience the international product. For example,In many countries of Africa, superstores offer the diffierent countries food which may not able to travel easily due to expensive travels cost..

Furthermore, Supermarkets alos provide opportunities to the individual to camparing different prices which help to acquire the skills such as decision making, logical and cognative abilities which help them in their personal and professional growth. For instance, ususally supperstores taged the different prices of the same product so it can be easy for the people to choose according to their budget.

In conclusion, Although demapartmental stores play an indispensale role in improving the people lives.In my opinion, it is not provide opportunitity to save their time and money but also helps to develop essential skill which is benefical for their future life developments.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You give a clear positive position in the introduction and conclusion, and both body paragraphs offer relevant reasons: access to foods unavailable locally, and the chance to compare prices. The Africa example also attempts to illustrate the first point. However, the response only partially develops the task: it says little about why access to international food is beneficial beyond convenience and cost, and the claim that price comparison develops “logical and cognitive abilities” is not explained or convincingly supported. The example is also vague. The response is 14 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop your reasons. Add specific explanation and a more precise example to make the argument fuller.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “To begin with” and “Furthermore,” and a conclusion. This makes the main points reasonably easy to identify. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the first body paragraph moves from local availability to travel costs and then to saving money without fully showing how these ideas connect. Some linking is mechanical, and the conclusion repeats the introduction rather than drawing the reasons together. Punctuation also disrupts flow in places, such as “For example,In many countries” and the run-on spacing before “In my opinion.” Use clearer links between each claim and its explanation, and ensure each paragraph develops one central point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “availability,” “international product,” “budget,” and “decision making,” and the reader can generally understand your intended meaning. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, such as “experience the international product,” “superstores tagged the different prices,” and “future life developments.” Spelling errors are also frequent, including “becuase,” “opportunites,” “diffierent,” and “cognative,” which reduce the overall clarity and control. Aim to use more precise phrases for the benefits you describe, and proofread carefully for spelling and word forms. Repeating “opportunities” and “provide” also makes the vocabulary less varied.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause with “because” and a relative clause beginning “which.” However, the range is limited, and complex sentences are often faulty. Examples include “people purchases” and “it provide,” where subject–verb agreement is incorrect, and “those good which is not easily available,” where number agreement is inconsistent. Articles and sentence boundaries also cause problems, as in “an positive impact” and the conclusion’s run-together sentences. These errors recur and sometimes make the intended relationships difficult to follow. Practise building accurate sentences with plural subjects, relative clauses, and clear punctuation before adding further complexity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.