Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many countries are working a lot to improve the buying pattern for their people just to make it more convenient.

In my opinion, getting access to the products from all over the world is a privilege that is being cherished by people around the world. Supermarkets where people cannot get all their desired things are a bit hectic to shop, and also most of the people don't want to visit them; instead, they choose to order online.

Firstly, many people who can't afford to go to other places to have high-end quality food can easily get it from supermarkets.

Secondly, if a person is a frequent traveller, then there's no need to worry about the food products because if they are a loyal customer of any multinational brand, they can easily get it anywhere from the world.

For example, I am a student, and I have to visit Pakistan and Saudi Arabia frequently. As a parkistani, I am a loyal consumer of the Shan Masala brand. Now I don't have to be worried about taking those Masala boxes with me before going to Saudia because I know I can easily get them from the stores situated there.

From my side, it is actually a positive development, and it also makes life convenient.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you consider worldwide food availability a positive development, and you give relevant reasons, including convenience for travellers and access to familiar products. The example of buying Shan Masala in Saudi Arabia helps make your point concrete. However, the discussion is only partly developed: the claim that people can obtain “high-end quality food” is not explained, and the point about supermarkets being “hectic” shifts toward online shopping without showing how this supports your view. The response also falls 38 words short of the required minimum, limiting the space available to explain and support your ideas. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation or example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable overall order: an opening opinion, two reasons, a personal example, and a concluding statement. “Firstly” and “Secondly” help signal the main points, and the example follows naturally from the point about familiar products. However, the progression is not consistently clear. The opening moves from international food availability to online shopping, which introduces a related but undeveloped idea. The two reasons are presented briefly, and the conclusion largely repeats the opinion rather than drawing the points together. Use separate, clearly focused paragraphs for the introduction, each developed reason, and the conclusion; add linking explanations so readers can see how each example supports your argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough vocabulary to communicate your main position and examples, including “access,” “frequent traveller,” “loyal customer,” and “convenient.” Some topic-related wording shows an attempt to be specific. However, several choices are imprecise or unnatural, such as “improve the buying pattern,” “high-end quality food,” and “hectic to shop.” “Cherished” does not fit naturally with access to products, and “parkistani” is misspelled. Repetition of “easily get” also limits the range. Aim for more precise collocations, such as “shopping habits,” “a wide range of imported food,” and “find it convenient to shop,” and check spelling and word choice carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, and most of your meaning remains clear. For example, the conditional sentence “if a person is a frequent traveller, then there's no need to worry” shows an attempt to express a more developed idea. Some grammatical errors remain: “Supermarkets where people cannot get all their desired things are a bit hectic to shop” has an unclear clause structure, while “I have to visit Pakistan and Saudi Arabia frequently” would be clearer as “I frequently travel to…”. The sentence beginning “As a parkistani” is also a fragment rather than a complete sentence. Work on complete sentence construction and clearer clause relationships, while continuing to use varied structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.