Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In current time several nations, buying food from a supermarket which is already made in the whole world. From my perspective this is a negative innovation because it is very expensive and harmful for your health.

Shopping the preserved food is very costly. Some food is damage quickly due to the natural process of it. However, to safe it for a long time there are many chemicals use as well as should be need a factory for production of it. There are many expenses involves in it such as electricity and transportation also have more expenditures in the form of packaging and advertising. A few people buying this product. Meanwhile, poor public cannot afford it. For example. in Pakistan a company which sell the frozen chicken, it has higher price than fresh.

In addition, several individuals go to market and buy meal make in all over the nations it is dangerous for their health. In food mixed many harmful ingredients and some chemicals also used, that is not beneficial for a human health. In that meals includes vital amount of dangerous elements that is not good for stomach. For instance, companies that make potato chips when any person will eat them it becomes his habit and addictive also harmful for his overall body. Therefore, it is not a good innovation.

In conclusion, those meals that buying from big markets are not get them easily due to its high range prices. A human life is very important and if they eat that kinds of food, its health will be in dangerous.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you consider worldwide supermarket food a negative development, mainly because of cost and health risks. Both points are relevant, and you include examples such as frozen chicken in Pakistan and potato chips. However, the discussion only partly addresses the issue: the cost argument focuses on preserved or processed food, while the prompt concerns food produced around the world, which is not necessarily preserved or unhealthy. The health claims are also broad, and the examples do not clearly show that imported food itself causes these problems. To develop the response further, explain how international availability affects consumers and support each reason with a more directly relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The paragraphs broadly separate cost from health, and signposts such as “In addition” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main points. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow: the first body paragraph moves from food spoiling to chemicals, factories, transport and advertising without clearly connecting each point to the cost of globally available food. Some linking phrases are awkward or repetitive, and “For example” is followed by a full stop rather than a comma. The conclusion repeats the main concerns but does not clearly synthesise them. Use clearer topic sentences and explain the relationship between each supporting detail and your central argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “preserved food,” “chemicals,” “transportation,” “packaging” and “addictive,” which helps communicate your concerns. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the meaning unclear. For example, “food is damage quickly” and “higher price than fresh” do not express the intended ideas naturally; “dangerous elements” is also vague. Repetition of “harmful,” “health” and “food” further limits precision. Build a more accurate set of phrases for discussing international food supply, affordability and nutrition, and check whether each word fits its context. More precise vocabulary would make your argument easier to understand.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause in “because it is very expensive” and a conditional structure beginning “when any person will eat them.” However, many sentences contain errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction, which can make the meaning difficult to follow. For example, “buying food from a supermarket which is already made” is not a complete, well-formed opening sentence, while “there are many chemicals use” and “A few people buying this product” have faulty verb forms. The conditional “when any person will eat them it becomes his habit” is also awkwardly constructed. Practise building accurate subject–verb sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check punctuation between clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.