Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is true that ,in this modern world customers prefer supermarkets for their daily needs in many nation becouse supermarkets have food products which are produced allover the globe.i have a partial view on the notion that its a positive change or negative.it has both perspective for individuals it is examplary becouse of thier much more convinience.Moreover for farmers there is less profits due to tere is no direct purchasing from farmers.I will shed light on both perspective in the upcoming paragraphs.

To commence with the reasons that how it is consider to be a beneficial for indivudals.Firstly,people are puchaseing from marts becouse these aremore convinient for individuals because mostly all the items in one roof is like blessing for them.Furthermore it is like time saving for them. For instance,if person goes to individuals stores like for vegetable,grocery and electronics ,so that is much more time consuming.Therefore, masses are prefering superstores and it proves fruitful for them.

Moving towards the engenders that,how buying good from superstores and food which is from different nation leads to its detrimental effects. First and foremost,if people start to shop from super markets sholy,so there is less margine are availabe for farmers of the country becouse there is no direct purchasing from farmers.In addition to this residents are more consuming more food which is manufactured from another nation ,so that can affect the economy of the country.Hence,there are various affects that can couse by just purchasing goods from marts .Moreover by consuming foreign items.

To conclude that,everything that has been stated so far proves that purchasing good fromsuperstores outways the its detrimental effects.However,a wide balance between both is more beneficial for individuals,farmers and for the nation it self.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both sides of the issue, noting convenience for shoppers and possible harm to local farmers and the national economy. Your conclusion also gives a position: the benefits of supermarkets outweigh the disadvantages. However, the opening says you have a “partial view” and that the change has “both perspective,” so your overall stance is not clear until the conclusion. The supporting ideas are relevant but remain general: the example of visiting separate shops explains convenience, while the claims about farmers’ profits and economic effects need clearer explanation or a specific example. State your position consistently from the introduction and develop each main reason with a more precise explanation.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for benefits and drawbacks, and a conclusion. This gives the reader an overall route through your discussion. You also use linking expressions such as “Firstly,” “Furthermore,” and “To conclude.” However, some transitions feel mechanical, and the progression within paragraphs is not always clear. For example, the final drawback paragraph moves from farmers’ margins to the economy and then ends with the incomplete thought “Moreover by consuming foreign items.” Some references, such as “it” and “that,” are also unclear. Organise each paragraph around one main point, connect explanation directly to that point, and remove or complete unfinished ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “time saving,” “direct purchasing,” “farmers,” and “economy,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “detrimental effects.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or spellings make the meaning difficult to follow, including “marts,” “engenders,” “sholy,” and “outways.” Repetition of “supermarkets,” “individuals,” and “beneficial” also limits flexibility. Aim for accurate, natural collocations rather than inserting formal-sounding words that do not fit the context. Proofread spelling and choose precise terms for the people and businesses involved, such as “consumers,” “retailers,” and “local producers.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt to combine ideas using clauses and connectors, for example, “because mostly all the items in one roof…” and “if people start to shop…,” but complex sentences are often faulty, and the range of reliably controlled structures is limited. Errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction occur throughout: “people are puchaseing,” “there is less margine are availabe,” and “everything that has been stated so far proves that…” The opening also contains punctuation and spacing problems that make it harder to read. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then add subordinate clauses. Check that each sentence has a clear subject and verb, and review agreement and article use before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.