Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In recent years, whether the consumers should go to supermarket to buy food which is produced all over the world have emerged as a subject of considerable debate. I totally agree that, this is a positive development because, buyers can purchase different variety of food.

One of the main benefit is, consumers urge to buy unique food is fulfilled, and they can discover new food, and consume accordingly. Subsequently, different countries have optimal climates, more efficient farming methods for special crops. Furthermore, the supermarkets are the one-stop destination, where the consumers can buy Italian olive oil, Mexican avocados, and Indian basmati rice under one roof in reasonable prices. For instance, a person living in Canada or America can fulfill their cravings of eating any seasonal fruits or vegetables, purchasing them from various famous local markets. Another significant benefit would be economic growth, and knowing culture information, Global food trade allows farmers in developing economies to access massive international markets. This creates jobs, stable income and economic growth. Also, The variety of foods available in supermarkets are fssat certified, which reduces the risk of any diseases or virus.

On the other hand, there may be some negative developments. To begin with, transporting food across continents via ships, plans, trucks generate massive carbon emissions. Moreove, during long journeys, loss of flavour and low nutritional value may occur, which may effect the well-being of the consumer. For example, Global supermarket food gives us great variety all years. Howeverm shipping it long distance results in high pollution and causes the food to loose it vitamins and taste.

In conclusion, while global food trade bring year-round variety and convenience, the resulting pollution and nurient loss mean we must strike a balance.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you consider worldwide food availability positive, while acknowledging environmental and nutritional drawbacks. You address both sides and support the benefits with relevant examples, such as olive oil, avocados and basmati rice, and the access this trade gives farmers in developing economies. This meets the task well, with ideas generally extended and supported. Some claims, however, are broad or not fully explained: the point about food being “fssat certified” and reducing disease risk is unclear, and the cultural benefit is mentioned without development. The conclusion identifies a need for balance, but could make your final judgement more explicit about why the benefits outweigh the costs. Clarifying these points would make the argument more consistently convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph focused mainly on benefits, a paragraph on drawbacks, and a conclusion. The progression from consumer choice to economic effects is understandable, and signposts such as “On the other hand” help distinguish the opposing view. This provides a coherent overall arrangement. However, some links feel mechanical or unclear, particularly the repeated use of “Furthermore,” “Also,” and “For example.” The first body paragraph also combines consumer choice, economic growth, cultural knowledge and food safety, so its focus becomes diffuse. The example about year-round variety in the negative paragraph partly repeats an earlier benefit rather than clearly supporting the criticism. Grouping related points and making each example’s connection explicit would strengthen cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range for the topic, including phrases such as “international markets,” “carbon emissions,” “nutritional value” and “one-stop destination.” These help communicate both economic and environmental aspects, and you attempt some less common expressions. At times, however, word choice and collocation are inaccurate or awkward: “different variety,” “knowing culture information,” “in reasonable prices” and “loose it vitamins” reduce naturalness. There are also spelling errors, including “plans,” “Moreove,” “Howeverm” and “nurient.” These do not generally prevent understanding, but they make the writing less precise. Check spelling carefully and learn common word partnerships, such as “a variety of foods,” “cultural knowledge” and “at reasonable prices,” to improve control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex forms, including a reason clause with “because” and a contrast structure beginning “while global food trade…”. The main ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “whether the consumers should… have emerged” has a mismatch between the singular subject “whether” clause and the plural verb; “One of the main benefit is” needs plural agreement; and “the variety of foods… are” should use singular agreement. Articles and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “go to supermarket” and the comma after “agree that.” Some sentences are overloaded with linked clauses, which makes their structure harder to control. Practise checking subject–verb agreement, articles and punctuation, then vary sentence patterns while keeping each sentence focused.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.