Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Recently, the accessibility of food has increased globally and people can now buy any type of food from their nearby superstore. It is definitely a positive development as it serves the purpose of international cuisine and cultural awareness. However, in my opinion there are more negatives effects than positive.

To begin with positive changes, it provides the community a wide variety of food items. It allows them to experience various tastes. It also cultivates cultural awareness and recognition. For example, availability of japanese and italian foods have enhanced the culinary experiences.

Although these benefits are valid, but there are more drawbacks to it. For instance, when the goods are imported from all over the world, it effects the local harvesting and producers of goods in the country. The seller faces undercut of their selling value because of high competition with other producers internationally. For example, when the people have wide access to external goods, they may opt for such products over locally manuactured products. The items manufactured internationally are often sold in cheap prices than the locally created one. Furthermore, it has environmental effect as well. For example, imporitng of goods also contribute in carbon emission as the goods travel from long distance and the burnt fuel causes carbondioxide in the air, which is the major factor of climate change.

In conclusion, the exposure to different cultural foods provides a great hand of experience to the local citizen but it is also important to value their locally made goods. So th

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is identifiable: you acknowledge the benefits of international food but ultimately argue that the drawbacks are greater. You address both sides with relevant points, including cultural exposure, pressure on local producers and emissions from transport. The examples of Japanese and Italian food and imported goods competing with local products help illustrate the discussion. However, the opening briefly calls the development “definitely a positive” before stating that negatives outweigh positives, which makes your position less consistent. The environmental point is relevant but would benefit from clearer explanation of how transport emissions arise and why they outweigh the benefits. The conclusion also ends abruptly (“So th”), leaving your final judgement incomplete. Develop the main reasons more fully and maintain one clear position throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on benefits, a longer paragraph on drawbacks and a conclusion. Signposting such as “To begin with” and “For instance” helps readers follow the main points. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. “Although these benefits are valid, but” uses two contrasting signals together, and the shift from the opening’s positive claim to the later negative position weakens progression. The drawbacks paragraph also combines competition for local producers with environmental harm, so clearer sequencing or separate paragraphs would make each argument easier to follow. The final sentence is cut off, disrupting the conclusion. Use linking phrases selectively and ensure each paragraph develops one central idea in a complete sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “cultural awareness,” “high competition,” “locally manufactured products” and “carbon emission.” These choices show an attempt to discuss food markets and environmental consequences rather than relying only on basic terms. However, several word-choice and collocation problems reduce precision: “a wide variety of food items” is clearer than “a wide variety of food items” only if the surrounding phrasing is refined, while “faces undercut of their selling value” and “provides a great hand of experience” are unnatural expressions. There are also spelling errors such as “japanese,” “manuactured” and “imporitng,” alongside “carbondioxide.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling, especially in key topic terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “when the people have wide access … they may opt” and a reason clause explaining transport emissions. Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “availability … have enhanced” has a subject–verb agreement problem, and “Although these benefits are valid, but” has an incorrect conjunction pattern. In “the goods … it effects the local harvesting,” the pronoun reference and sentence construction are unclear; “goods” also requires a plural verb in this structure. The conclusion’s final clause is incomplete. Review agreement, clause linking and sentence completion, then proofread punctuation and articles. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.