Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, with the help of well developed transportation, food from different countries have become accessible to locals by just a visit to the supermarket. Although this might cause some problems to the local producers, I believe it is a positive thing as it provides consumer more options.

One of the major benefit of this is the variety of food being available for the consumers. There could be a posibility that some type of food may not be available at certain location such as exotic fruits or vegetables. Having access to food from different coutries also let the people experience different cultural foods and cuisin without having to travel abroad.

Although the availability has benefits, it could cause problems to the local sellers of the country. There is a posibility that the local farmers could not match the cheaper rates of imported food items. Due to this, their efforts could be discouraged and they might have to face loss. Additionally, importing items from different coutries takes up a lot of fuel for travel. This course emmision of toxic gas which contributes to air polution and harm to the environment.

Overall, having able to access food from different countries could be of a great benefit if done rightly. The government should help the local vendors and farmers which their produce and additionally encourage the transport industry to adapt to more sustainable means of travel to protect our surroundings.

Hence, even though this cause a threat to the local selles and cause harm to the environment, if the proper measures are taken up, being able to buy food produced from all over the world would let people have more options and access to food and tastes that is not produced in their country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you consider worldwide food availability positive because it gives consumers more choice, while acknowledging pressure on local producers and environmental costs. This addresses both the positive-or-negative question and supports your view with relevant points, such as access to foods unavailable locally and the fuel used in imports. However, some ideas are asserted rather than fully explained. For example, the cultural benefit of trying other cuisines could be illustrated with a specific example, and the effects on farmers and the environment would be stronger if you explained their wider consequences. Your conclusion introduces government support and sustainable transport, but these measures are not developed in the main discussion. Extend the key points with concrete examples and clearer explanation.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, separate paragraphs discuss consumer benefits and drawbacks, and the final paragraphs return to your position. Linking expressions such as “Although,” “Additionally,” and “Overall” help signal the relationships between ideas. However, the progression is not always smooth. The conclusion is split across two paragraphs beginning “Overall” and “Hence,” and both repeat the same qualified position; combining them would create a more decisive ending. Some references are also unclear, particularly “if done rightly” and “which their produce,” where the reader must infer the intended connection. Use cohesive devices selectively and make pronoun references and links between claims more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “local producers,” “imported food items,” “cultural foods,” and “sustainable means of travel.” These choices communicate the main ideas, and attempts to use more specific language are evident. However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “course emmision” and “access to food and tastes,” which reduce precision. Spelling errors—including “posibility,” “coutries,” “cuisin,” and “polution”—also occur across the response. Check spelling carefully and learn common topic collocations, for example, “emissions from transportation” and “a wider range of foods.” This would make your vocabulary more natural and precise without changing your argument.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concessive opening (“Although this might cause…”) and a conditional conclusion (“if the proper measures are taken…”). Most of the meaning remains clear, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “food … have become” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “it provides consumer more options” needs a plural noun and an article or determiner. In “Having access … also let the people,” the verb form does not agree with the gerund subject, and “even though this cause” needs a correctly inflected verb. Review agreement, articles, and verb forms, then proofread each sentence. Greater accuracy in these patterns would strengthen control of your varied sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.