Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the contemporary era , the supermarket are very popular among public . Consumer can go to supermarket and purchase different type of food all over the world . I believe that it is positive development for the country . This easy will discuss the benfits of imported food in a nation .

To begin with , supermarkets have become an essential part of people's lives . It is very convenient because it provide every kind of food under one roof . people can essaily buy food edible items at one time . This stores assist to save travel time and transport cost . However , grocery stores also give opportunity to people enjoy different type of food from other countries . For example , some candian super stores offer various indian food products such as spices , rice and traditional snaks which help indian families to prepare their culutural cusine . As a result local people also experience different cuisines and taste .

Nevertheless , purchase food all over the world aslo offer numerious economic benifits . If a country export food from one nation to other then it help to create business opportunities for unployeed worker . For instance , need workers in transportation , packaging and supermarket businesses . As a result proverty will mitigated . Moreover , international products encourage food compaines to improve their quality of food and offer competitive price. International food also help to tackle problem of shortage of food .

In conculsion , i my opinion i believe that supermarkets are postive development . It provide diverse food choices and promotes international trade .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you consider access to food from around the world a positive development, and the conclusion restates this view. You give relevant reasons, including convenience, exposure to other cuisines, employment and trade, and food availability. The Canadian supermarket example also helps illustrate cultural variety. This covers the task well, but the support is uneven: the convenience and cuisine points are explained more clearly than the economic claims. In particular, the link between importing food and reducing poverty is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the discussion of food shortages needs a specific explanation. Develop these points with a clear cause-and-effect explanation or a concrete example to make the argument more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The ideas generally progress from convenience and cultural variety to economic benefits, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Nevertheless” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. “Nevertheless” suggests a contrast, although the economic benefits continue the positive argument, and “If a country export food from one nation to other” makes the relationship between importing and exporting difficult to follow. The final paragraph is also brief and repeats the position without drawing the main reasons together. Use transitions that reflect the actual relationship between ideas, and make links between sentences explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “convenient,” “transportation,” “competitive price” and “food shortage,” and you attempt more specific expressions such as “cultural cuisine” and “business opportunities.” This gives you enough range to communicate the main points, but inaccurate word choice, word forms and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include “food edible items,” “unployeed worker,” “proverty” and “postive development.” Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “experience different cuisines and taste.” Aim to learn topic vocabulary in accurate phrases and check spelling and word forms carefully. More precise wording would make your economic argument clearer as well as improve the overall fluency of the essay.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “products … which help Indian families” and a conditional structure beginning “If a country export food.” The main ideas are usually understandable, but errors in agreement, articles, plurals and sentence construction occur across the response. For example, “the supermarket are” and “it provide” do not match their subjects, while “different type of food” needs a plural form or a different construction. The conditional sentence is also difficult to interpret because its verb forms and relationship between exporting and importing are not controlled. Review subject–verb agreement and article use, then build complex sentences around one clear relationship at a time. More accurate sentence patterns would make your ideas easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.