Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-07-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

More and more people nowadays visit well-known places to take photographs of themselves, without looking at the place.

Why do you think this is happening?

Is it a positive or a negative trend?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued by many that the government should allocate more funds in preserving the ecosystem, whereas other believe the heath sector should be highly prioritized. Although spending money in protection of environment helps controlling pollution and saving natural resources, funds allocated in medical facilities improves quality of life and growth of nation.

One the one hand, protecting the ecosystem can help the upcoming generation. By investing more for the preservation of environment can helps in conservating wildlife, controlling pollution and saving wildlife, which is crucial for the new generation. For example, Sweden, the government took initiative in more electric vehicles, which not only provides substantial solution, but also helps in sustainable future of the ecosystem. Consequently, more financial support in protection of environment can leads to saving natural resources and

On the other hand, many individuals believe government should improving healthcare should be extremely important because it can be beneficial in improvised quality of life and reduces life mortality. Moreover, if government adequately fund the medical sector, the older equipment can be replaced with latest technology, which not only helps diagnosing illness at an early stage, but also improves the life expectancy of the patients'. As a result, allocating money to healthcare helps in improved treatments and more productive society.

To conclude, although investing in the protection of ecosystem can help preserving endangered species and reducing pollution; however, I believe spending adequate funds in healthcare sector provides more productive nation and improvised life expectancy.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response is completely off-topic. The prompt asks about people visiting well-known places to take photographs without looking at the location, but the essay discusses government spending on the environment versus healthcare. Because the response fails to address the task requirements entirely, it cannot be scored higher than a Band 3.0 for Task Achievement. Additionally, the response is under the minimum word count, which further impacts the ability to develop ideas relevant to the actual prompt. To improve, you must carefully read the instructions and ensure your arguments directly answer the specific questions posed in the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay uses basic paragraphing and some cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand' and 'To conclude'. However, because the content is irrelevant to the prompt, the logical progression is disconnected from the task. The structure is mechanical, and the flow of ideas is hindered by the fact that the essay is arguing a completely different topic than the one assigned. While there is an attempt to organize the text into an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, the lack of relevance to the prompt makes the overall coherence ineffective.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for a basic level but lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. There are several word-choice errors, such as 'improvised quality of life' (likely meaning 'improved') and 'life mortality' (which is redundant). The range is limited, and the repetition of phrases like 'government should' and 'investing in' suggests a restricted vocabulary. To improve, focus on using more precise collocations and avoiding repetitive phrasing. You should also work on using more sophisticated vocabulary related to the actual topic of the essay.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text. Examples include 'other believe' (should be 'others believe'), 'spending money in protection' (should be 'on the protection'), 'can helps in conservating' (should be 'can help in conserving'), and 'can leads to' (should be 'can lead to'). The sentence structures are mostly simple or contain errors when attempting complexity. Punctuation is also inconsistent, such as the misuse of the semicolon in the conclusion. A significant number of sentences contain errors that, while not always impeding communication, show a lack of control over basic grammatical structures.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.