Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

More and more people nowadays visit well-known places to take photographs of themselves, without looking at the place.

Why do you think this is happening?

Is it a positive or a negative trend?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

A rising number of people are visiting famous places for photoshoots, and ignoring their historical importance. I believe that social media is key reason for this trend, and It is a negative development because that affects the popularity of places after a few time.

The primary cause is that people are blindly following their favorite celebrities on the social media, who exploring the important places for their digital content. Those viewers follow their idols and visit different places just for taking photos, without knowing the historical pretext of these places. For example, although in Egypt the tourism industry is soaring, huge numbers of tour guides quit their jobs as people are not keen to learn about their history, instead professional photographers are replacing them.

This kind of development is considered as a negative because people are forgetting the historical background of these locations, and after the long-time this places might not have any visitors. This will create a huge impact on the local economy, by reducing the revenue of the locals, and places might be damaged in absence of maintenance. For instance, according to the data published by the New York Times, the famous places would have no longer be able to attract visitors as younger generation does not like to learn about historical importance.

In conclusion, a growing number of men and women are visiting famous locations to capture their photos, and avoids the detailed observation of these locations. This essay maintains that Internet is responsible for this and it is a disadvantageous development because it damages the popularity of these places.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the reasons for the trend and whether it is positive or negative. The position is clear throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the example regarding Egypt and tour guides is a bit generic and lacks a strong logical link to the 'photographing' aspect of the prompt. While the impact on the economy is mentioned, the argument could be more deeply explored with more specific reasoning. Overall, the response covers the requirements well, but the depth of analysis is more characteristic of a Band 6.0 or 6.5 level.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a central theme. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'The primary cause', 'For example', and 'In conclusion', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical or repetitive. The referencing is generally clear, though there are minor issues with flow between sentences. For example, the phrase 'after a few time' in the introduction is awkward and disrupts the logical progression. Overall, the paragraphing is appropriate, and the progression of ideas is easy to follow, meeting the requirements for a Band 6.5.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There are attempts to use less common vocabulary, such as 'pretext' (though used incorrectly here, as 'context' was likely intended) and 'disadvantageous'. Some word choices are slightly unnatural, such as 'after a few time' or 'in absence of maintenance'. While the range is sufficient to communicate the message, the lack of precision and occasional misuse of words prevent a higher score. The vocabulary is functional but lacks the flexibility and sophistication required for a Band 7.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'who exploring' instead of 'who are exploring', 'after the long-time this places' instead of 'in the long term, these places', and 'avoids' instead of 'avoid'. Punctuation is generally acceptable, but the frequency of errors in basic grammar and verb forms is noticeable. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to limit the score. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of articles and prepositions.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.