Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-11-05
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Nowadays, scientists are doing innovations day-by-day for the betterment of humankind. Therefore, they will be making such type of vehicles which don't required any driver. They operated without the involvement of any driver.The only public that are inside these vehicles will be travellers rather than a driver. Although I do not assert that it has more pros comparatively to their cons.
To initiate this discussion, one of the noteable drawbacks is that this will sink employement opportunities resultantly financial condition of public will be affected badly. Most of the population presue their careers in driving field. If this happen consequently they will loss their jobs. For instance, my brother is living in the Germany and he doing Uber as their main source of income. He doesn't have any other talent. If driverless vehicles will produce then it will become very difficult for him to earn handsome amount of money.
Additionally, a further supporting point is that this will enhance the accidental cases.Moreover, software will be used to operate such transpotation. If any bug or error occur in this software then a collision will happen which will cost an injuery or even with a life.For example, Elon Musk is trying to make driverless cars but he doesn't get success yet just because whenever he did testing they crashed with obstacles that came in his way.
Although some people say that it has a crucial benefit like this will enhance the technology. They will aid the individuals to reach on their destination faster than expected. Furthermore, these type of vehicles are less costly and efficient comparatively others.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that driverless vehicles are not counted as fundamental technology for human beings right now but may be in future. If governments will want to implement this idea then they should try to take strictly precautionary measurements along with it.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You address the topic by presenting disadvantages—job losses and possible software-related accidents—and briefly acknowledging benefits such as faster journeys and efficiency. However, the response does not clearly answer the central question of whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages: the opening says you do not assert that they do, while the conclusion mainly says the technology is not fundamental now and may be useful in future. This leaves your position only partly clear. The examples about your brother and vehicle testing are relevant, but the first is developed more fully than the second, and the benefits are listed rather than explained. State your judgement directly and support both sides with clearer explanation before reaching a firm conclusion.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two paragraphs on disadvantages, a paragraph on benefits, and a conclusion. This helps the reader follow the broad direction of your argument. However, progression between ideas is sometimes mechanical, with repeated transitions such as “Additionally,” “Moreover,” and “Furthermore,” and some links do not show the precise relationship between claims. For example, the paragraph on benefits moves quickly from technology to faster travel and lower cost without explaining how these points connect. The conclusion also introduces government precautions without linking them clearly to your overall judgement. Use topic sentences that state each paragraph’s main point, then develop it in a logical sequence with clearer referencing.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “employment opportunities,” “source of income,” “software,” “collision,” and “efficient.” These choices make the main subject and examples understandable. However, the range is limited by repeated general wording and noticeable errors in spelling, word form, and collocation, such as “noteable drawbacks,” “sink employement opportunities,” “accidental cases,” and “precautionary measurements.” Some phrases, including “the only public that are inside,” are also unnatural and make the reader pause. Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than more elaborate wording: for example, describe jobs as being “displaced” and refer to “road accidents” or “safety precautions.” Proofreading spelling and checking collocations would make your ideas clearer.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including conditional forms such as “If this happen consequently they will loss their jobs” and a concession beginning “Although some people say…”. These attempts show an effort to vary sentence structure, but complex sentences are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some passages difficult to read. Examples include “vehicles which don't required,” “They operated,” “Most of the population presue,” and “If any bug or error occur.” Agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries also need attention; for instance, “The only public that are inside” has unclear agreement, and several sentences run together after full stops. Practise accurate present and future forms, subject–verb agreement, and punctuation before adding more complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.