Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.

Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In the future, self driving cars, buses, and trucks will takeover and only passengers will be travelling in these vehicles. This advancement will allow people to utilize their travel time doing something productive and they won't have to pay the driver either. However, driverless cars would lead to unemployment and the public might be hesitant to adopt it. I believe advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Most of the time, people drive themselves to work, university, or other places. This driving experience can be very stressful for a lot of people especially during rush hours. Driverless cars can help people by taking away the stress of driving. It would allow people to relax while travelling from one place to another. They can utilize their travel time preparing for a meeting or an exam. Moreover, people won't have to pay for drivers anymore. Furthermore, self driving cars would probably use a gps or other advanced technology to avoid routes with traffic jams and would also adhere to the laws.

However, if the driverless cars, buses, and trucks takeover in the future many people might lose their job. This will give rise to unemployment. Furthermore, the public might have a lot of safety concerns regrading these self driving vehicles. They might show resistance to adopting such cars. Moreover, self driving cars can only function properly in countries with a well constructed and maintained road system. In countries like Paksitan, where the roads are either in a very bad condition or are potholes, these cars might not function properly.

In conclusion, self driving cars, buses, and trucks would become common in the future. The advantages are that people won't have to stress about driving and wouldn't have to pay the drivers. However, the drawbacks are that it would increase unemployment and raise safety concers. I believe the benefits are far more greater then the disadvantages.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I believe advantages outweigh the disadvantages”—and is reaffirmed in the conclusion. You address both sides with relevant points: reduced stress and driver costs, alongside job losses, safety concerns, and limitations on poor roads. This covers the task well. To make the argument more fully developed, explain the consequences or relative importance of these points. For example, you mention that people could prepare for meetings while travelling, but do not show how this benefit compares with the employment impact. The claim that vehicles would “adhere to the laws” also needs support or qualification. Your response already has a clear stance and relevant support; more specific examples and fuller evaluation would strengthen it further.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for benefits and drawbacks, and a conclusion that restates your view. Ideas generally progress logically, and linking expressions such as “However,” “Moreover,” and “Furthermore” help signal relationships. The organisation is effective, though some transitions feel mechanical because several points are added with the same linking pattern rather than connected through explanation. For instance, the benefits paragraph moves from reduced stress to driver costs and then route planning without showing how these ideas relate. The conclusion repeats much of the introduction and body. To improve progression, group related points and use a sentence explaining their connection or significance; also make references such as “these cars” unmistakably clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “driverless,” “unemployment,” “safety concerns,” and “maintained road system.” These choices make your main ideas clear, and you attempt more specific language when discussing traffic and road conditions. However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or informal, which limits precision: “takeover” should be written as “take over” in this context, “regrading” is a spelling error for “regarding,” and “far more greater” is not a correct comparative expression. “Utilize” is also repeated and sounds unnecessarily formal beside simpler phrasing. Aim for accurate collocations and vary repeated terms such as “self driving cars”; careful proofreading would remove spelling slips like “Paksitan” and “conc ers.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “if the driverless cars…takeover…many people might lose their job” and clauses explaining what vehicles could do. Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, and errors do not generally prevent understanding. Some grammatical inaccuracies remain, however. In “many people might lose their job,” the plural subject calls for “jobs”; “the public might be hesitant to adopt it” has an unclear singular pronoun after plural vehicles; and “far more greater” uses an incorrect comparative form. The sentence beginning “In countries like Pakistan” also has an awkward construction that obscures the relationship between poor roads and potholes. Review agreement, pronoun reference, and comparative forms, while keeping the range of sentence structures you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.