Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.

Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Due to the technological advancement, some people believe that in the future all cars, buses and trucks will not need any human involvement to be driven and the only people using these vehicles to travel will be passengers. I strongly believe that the disadvantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the advantages which I will explain in this essay.

To begin with, in the modern era, a lot of new additions to vehicles get added everyday, due to the scientific and technological advancement. The problem with the driverless vehichles in my opinion is that you can't rely on technology alone for thee saftey of people, there is still a room for error and we can't risk the lives of individuals for companies to test their projects, therefore, this is a major problem. In comparison to trained drivers, I think the driverless vehichles lose. Other problems include the loss of jobs for many drivers and the unemployment of people who rely on this job. Analysts conducted research on a group of individuals in the US and the result of the research found that 90% feel safer when the cars are driven by a real driver.

However, some argue that this is the future and the more we become advanced, the more we have to make our lives easier using technology. The talk about the future means there's still a room for improvement, tests, and for anyone who is worried about his saftey.

In conclusion, I firmly believe we can't rely on driveless vehicles for security measures, at least for now. I also think they will cause a major unemployment for this sector which will harm the economy and drivers, so the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you believe the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. You address both sides by discussing safety and driver unemployment, then acknowledging that automation may make life easier and could improve through further testing. These are relevant reasons, but the advantages are only briefly mentioned, and the safety argument would benefit from a specific explanation of how technical failures could endanger passengers. The claim that 90% of US respondents feel safer with human drivers is relevant, but its source and connection to your argument are not explained. Develop both sides more evenly and support claims with clearer examples to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, a paragraph presenting disadvantages, a contrasting paragraph, and a conclusion that restates your view. Linking phrases such as “To begin with,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages. However, the second body paragraph is very short and does not develop the advantages or explain how testing might address safety concerns, so the progression feels uneven. Some connections are also mechanical, and the long first body paragraph combines safety, employment, and survey evidence without clearly separating their roles. Use topic sentences and more explicit links between each reason and your overall position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “driverless vehicles,” “technological advancement,” “trained drivers,” and “unemployment,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or repetitive. For example, “new additions to vehicles get added” is redundant, “a major unemployment” is not a natural expression, and “security measures” does not precisely express the safety concern in your conclusion. Spelling errors such as “vehichles,” “saftey,” and “driveless” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural phrases and check spelling carefully; the suggestions below offer useful alternatives.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “we can't risk the lives of individuals” and a contrast introduced by “However.” The overall meaning is usually clear, but some sentence structures and punctuation need more control. The opening sentence is long and awkwardly joined, while “The problem … is that you can't rely on technology alone …, there is still a room for error” joins two independent clauses with a comma. There are also issues with articles and agreement, as in “there's still a room” and “the result … found.” Review sentence boundaries, article use, and subject–verb relationships, then proofread complex sentences to ensure each clause is complete.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.