Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.

Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is argued that in the future there would be driverless vehicles that would only carry the passengers inside them. This feature brings many disadvantages and advantages that i will be discussing about in this essay, and i will be providing my view that human convenice and productivity increase is significantly outweighing the possible disadvantges.

In the possible future where having a driverless vehicle means for passangers to increase their productivity as well as their efficiency by putting that journey hours into their ugrent or important work. When a person drives, it requires all their focus on the road, for however long the journey is. This takes away precious and valuable time that could have been spent on doing something productive or dealing with urgent matters. For instance, one person might want to spend their commute to university finishing up their assisnment or some might prefer to nap doing long over-night traveling. The driverless vehicles allow for humans to have the time to attend to their personal needs or wants and is a great way to boost productivity levels of people. Hence the extent to which the advantages of driverless vehicle contribute towards humans and making their llives conveint is significant.

On the contrary, some might believe that self-driving cars are a hazard to human safety in several ways. Till this date no automated veheicle has a 100% ratio for accurately driving into busy roads, making it a huge risk that can have fatal consequences. Machines and AI cannot predict or analyse human emotions such as rage on road or take critical decisions that require human senses. For example, a recent viral video showcases a test drive for a self driving car that deters away from the main road and crashes into a still police car, which clearly shows how unreliable these automated cars are and the huge cost to pay for conveince.

In conclusion, I believe that self driving cars can be a great way to increase human efficeny as well as conveince, however the risks should be tested and tried properly before allowing to be on roads.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you believe the gains in convenience and productivity outweigh the safety risks, and you address both sides of the question. The productivity paragraph is relevant and supported with examples such as completing an assignment or resting during an overnight journey. You also explain the safety concern and give an example of a vehicle crashing into a police car. This covers the task well, but the discussion is not equally developed: the safety point relies heavily on one anecdote, and the conclusion adds that vehicles should be tested before use without explaining how this affects your overall judgement. Develop the risks and weigh them more explicitly against the benefits to make the argument more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for benefits and drawbacks, and a conclusion. The progression from productivity to safety is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the contrary” and “In conclusion” help orient the reader. Some linking is mechanical or imprecise, however: “Hence” introduces a broad restatement rather than a distinct consequence, while “This feature” in the introduction does not clearly identify a specific feature. The long first body paragraph also combines several related points without a clear internal sequence. Use more precise referencing and organise each paragraph around one main claim, followed by explanation and evidence, to make cohesion more flexible and natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “driverless vehicles,” “automated cars,” “productivity,” “fatal consequences,” and “self-driving cars.” This gives you enough range to discuss both convenience and safety, and some choices are effective. However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors weaken precision, including “conveince,” “efficeny,” “assissnment,” and “ugrent.” Some phrases are also unnatural or unclear, such as “putting that journey hours into their…work” and “a 100% ratio for accurately driving.” Aim for accurate collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, describe time as being “used to complete work” and refer to a vehicle’s “reliability” or “safety record” rather than a “ratio.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional and relative clauses, as in “When a person drives, it requires all their focus on the road” and “which clearly shows how unreliable these automated cars are.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors and awkward constructions reduce control. For example, “there would be driverless vehicles that would only carry” is an unnecessarily awkward future construction, and “the extent to which the advantages…contribute…is significant” has an unclear structure. In “the risks should be tested and tried properly before allowing to be on roads,” the final clause lacks a clear subject. Practise making complex sentences with clear subjects and parallel structures, and check agreement, articles, and clause completeness.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.