Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.

Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The prediction of driverless vehicles in the future is quite concerning. Although, it has many advantages such as the driver's cost is reduced and also there will be less chance of accidents caused by driver's negligence.But, as far as my prospective is concerned, I do not think that the advantages of driverless vehicles outweighs its disadvantages. Driverless vehicles can be efficients but the main concern should be human rights and welfare and not money. There are few reasons behind my prospective which are listed below.

Due to driverless cars, many people, who worked as drivers, will lose their jobs and many families will face financial crises. Also, a lot of money will be required to design such cars and it is a great possibility that the manufacturing cost will be much more than the profit. In consequence, there will be a great threat to the stability of world economy.

Another reason is that such vehicles are mainly designed to transport people to a fixed destination. In case of any kind of emergency, peple will face problems in order to stop the car or to call for help. For example, a person travelling in a driverless car, suffers from heart attck and is unable to press the button to stop or unlock the car, he will be driven to death.

So, despite having advantages, driverless cars should not be normalized because od the sensitive and changing nature of human beings. That is why, I think that disadvantages of driverless cars outweighs its advantages and hence, i do not advice to prefer such cars.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear throughout: you argue that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, and you acknowledge benefits such as lower driver costs and fewer accidents before explaining your concerns. The job-loss point is relevant, and the heart-attack example gives the emergency argument a concrete illustration. This meets the task well, but the support is uneven: the claim that manufacturing costs could threaten the world economy is asserted rather than explained, and the emergency scenario would be stronger if you clarified how a driverless system might fail to respond. To move further, develop each main reason with a more precise explanation or evidence, and make the comparison between the benefits and harms more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction states your view, two body sections present disadvantages, and a conclusion restates your position. Sequencing is generally logical, and transitions such as “Another reason” and “So” help readers follow the argument. However, some linking is mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “Also” and “That is why,” while the opening sentence moves quickly from advantages to your position without a smooth contrast. The reference in “such vehicles” is understandable but could be more precise, and the final paragraph repeats the central claim rather than drawing the reasons together. Use a wider range of natural transitions and make links between claims and examples clearer.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “driverless vehicles,” “financial crises,” “stability of world economy,” and “human rights and welfare.” These choices help communicate the main concerns, but the range and control are uneven, with several noticeable word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems. For example, “my prospective” is not the intended noun, “driverless cars should not be normalized” is an awkward way to express your recommendation, and “driven to death” is an imprecise phrase in this context. Errors such as “efficients,” “peple,” and “attck” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural collocations and check spelling; this will make your argument sound more fluent and appropriately formal.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex forms, including a concession with “Although” and a conditional example beginning “In case of any kind of emergency.” The overall meaning is usually clear, but some errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and punctuation remain. “Although, it has many advantages” is an incomplete construction as written, and “the advantages … outweighs” has a subject–verb agreement error. The heart-attack example also shifts into an awkward structure: “a person … suffers … and is unable …, he will be driven.” Punctuation spacing and sentence boundaries need attention, especially where “negligence.But” joins sentences. Practise building complete complex sentences and checking agreement and punctuation before submission.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.