Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this fast-paced world, people hire some other people occationally in order to get their work done, if they do not have time or willingness to do these jobs.It is definitely a balanced way of earning money as well as getting the things done whenever needed. In my opinion, Household works should be done independently if possible, otherwise paying to others for some kind of chores is absolutely a good way of increasing employement and helps care giving people to earn well.

Firstly, there are many people with different qualifications in the society and some of them are well educated and working in well-esteemed organisations, they actually creates opportunities to people who are under previledged by providing money for some works such as taking care for their baby, doing their house cleaning and cooking. Not only will it help them to get their small tasks done, but it is also a great way of providing and serving work in the society.

Furthermore, in some families around us, mostly both males and females are working. It is witnessed that, completing some essential house jobs can be difficult to manage with their professional life because they have less time left as well as they are struggling with the office pressure. In these situations, it will be really difficult to do everything alone and it can affect people's physical and mental health negaticvely. Consequently, It is completely fine to ask for help and getting the possible work done by paying others which can eventually allow them to spend good quality time with their family along with some physical exercise for their good health.

In conclusion, although people should try to be independent as much as possible and complete their chores themselves, however sometimes when it is not possibe to do these activities independently, it is completely okay to ask for paid help for their better physical and mental health. It also promotes unity in the society and address economic challenges for who are finantially deprived.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you support paid help when necessary, while saying people should do chores themselves when possible. You address both questions and give relevant reasons, including employment for people with fewer opportunities and the pressure on working parents. The examples of childcare, cleaning and cooking help keep the discussion on topic. However, the employment argument is asserted more than explained, and the claim that paid help “promotes unity” in the conclusion is not supported. The discussion of whether people should do these tasks themselves is also less developed than the case for hiring help. To strengthen the response, explain the conditions under which outsourcing is appropriate and develop each main reason with a specific example or consequence.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present reasons, and the conclusion restates your position. The progression from employment benefits to the pressures faced by working families is logical, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Furthermore” and “Consequently” make the argument easy to follow. Some linking is mechanical, however, and a few connections are not fully clear. For example, “It is witnessed that” does not smoothly introduce the point about working couples, while the conclusion’s claim about “unity” appears without preparation in the body. Improve cohesion by linking each paragraph’s main claim directly to its supporting explanation and by using pronouns and transitions that make relationships between ideas precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “fast-paced world,” “professional life,” “physical and mental health,” and “financially deprived.” These choices help communicate your ideas, and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal or less common language, but some expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “serving work,” “care giving people,” and “well-esteemed organisations.” Spelling errors—including “occationally,” “previledged,” “negaticvely” and “finantially”—also reduce accuracy. Aim for natural collocations and check spelling carefully; for instance, use “create employment opportunities,” “care workers,” and “well-established organisations.” This would make your vocabulary more precise and fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including the conditional “if they do not have time” and the result clause “which can eventually allow them to spend good quality time.” These structures help express relationships between ideas, and most sentences remain understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, particularly with agreement, sentence boundaries and clause construction. For example, “some of them … they actually creates” has an unclear subject and incorrect agreement; “jobs.It” needs a space and sentence boundary; and “ask for help and getting” mixes verb forms. The opening sentence also contains a comma splice. Review subject–verb agreement and keep parallel forms after coordinated verbs. More consistent control of these patterns would make your complex sentences clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.