Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-07-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Every coin has two sides. Sometimes individuals provide their responsibilities for part time to other's for example, household works or caretaker for children. I think that's fair idea to give work to others for sometime.

Initially, In a busy world each and every person is busy in there life and sometime masses want break from there daily routine. In other words, Mostly people are going to jobs after coming from work they have to do there works which they doing in there daily life and at one point they feel bored and tensed. Sometime they people faces the mental issues for example, anxiety, depression etc. So it's important to take break from there daily routine and people make plans for vacation with there loved ones or family members and gives responsibility to the responsible person in there contact. For instance, a news was published in " THE GUARDIAN" that people who don't stress about there daily routine and taking breaks from there work frequently spends there life happily as compared to others.

Moving to the next point, when masses gives part-time responsibility of their children to others children starts devolping there skills secretly. Explanation, when children spends time with others eg- caretakers. There brain secretly starts organizing the behaviour of the person who taking the care of child, In future children polishes there hidden skills and have a great chance to deal with society carefully. For example, a study shows that when children meet new people in there daily life children polishes there communication as well as reading the behaviour skills.

To conclude, when individuals do there things for someone for part time people feel fresh and concentrate more. Furthermore, there children become intelligent and starts to deveolp there skills secretly.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: whether it is a good way to provide work and whether people should do these things themselves. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. The argument regarding the benefits of outsourcing for mental health is clear, but the second point about children developing skills 'secretly' is repetitive and lacks logical depth. The position is consistent, but the explanation of the second point is slightly confusing and lacks a strong link to the prompt's core question about the necessity of doing tasks oneself. To reach a higher band, ensure that each point is fully extended with more specific, logical reasoning.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear introduction and conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. For example, the transition 'Explanation, when children spends time...' is awkward and does not effectively link the ideas. Referencing is sometimes unclear, such as the use of 'there' instead of 'their' throughout the text, which disrupts the flow. While the progression of ideas is generally followable, the lack of sophisticated linking words and the repetitive sentence structures limit the overall coherence.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks the range and precision required for higher bands. There is frequent misuse of basic words, such as 'provide their responsibilities' instead of 'delegate their responsibilities' and 'masses' used in an unnatural way. Spelling errors are frequent (e.g., 'devolping', 'deveolp', 'there' instead of 'their'). While the meaning is generally clear, the limited range of vocabulary and the persistent spelling issues prevent a higher score. To improve, focus on learning collocations and ensuring correct word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede readability. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'children starts', 'people faces'), incorrect pronoun usage ('there' instead of 'their'), and missing articles. While the writer attempts complex sentences, they are often marred by these errors. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. To improve, focus on basic sentence construction and proofreading for common grammatical slips like subject-verb agreement and homophones.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.