Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-07-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Nowadays, people’s schedules are getting busier, sometimes they look for someone to do their daily tasks like cleaning their house or look after their children. This essay will discuss the assets of offering duties for others, and if people should do these things themselves.

First and foremost, when employees are hiring workers to help them finish their daily tasks on behalf themselves, they create opportunities for others. In other words, It helps them to pay their bills and they can consider this job as a source of income. According to a study, the number of employees who work in cleaning services and nursery have increased by twenty per cent due to the high demand from the public to do their routine tasks.

Secondly, the question whether people should do these duties by themselves or not is a matter of debate. I believe that they can hire someone but only to some extent. For example, taking care of children should be the responsibility of parents because the child needs emotional support from his family not from the employees.

Another example, it imposes some financial burden on low income people which could be the reason of

According to a recent journal has shown that kids are more likely to have a emotional issues when nurses take care of them the whole time.

In conclusion, Hiring workers to do their daily work provides some perks but it should be reserved for a certain tasks to prevent from major consequences for children.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, discussing the economic benefits of hiring help and the personal responsibility of childcare. However, the development is uneven. The argument regarding financial burdens is left incomplete, and the essay falls just short of the 250-word minimum, which limits the depth of the analysis. While the position is clear, the ideas are somewhat under-developed, particularly in the second half of the essay where sentences are fragmented or lack logical completion. To improve, ensure all points are fully expanded with clear examples and ensure the essay meets the minimum length requirement to allow for sufficient elaboration.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay uses basic cohesive devices such as 'First and foremost' and 'Secondly' to structure the response. However, the progression of ideas is occasionally disrupted by grammatical errors and incomplete thoughts, such as the sentence starting 'Another example, it imposes...'. Paragraphing is present, but the internal flow within the paragraphs is sometimes mechanical. The referencing is occasionally unclear, and the transition between the benefits of hiring help and the drawbacks of childcare is abrupt. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear, unified focus would enhance the overall coherence.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express basic ideas. There are some attempts at topic-specific vocabulary like 'financial burden' and 'emotional support'. However, there are instances of imprecise word choice, such as 'assets of offering duties' (which is unnatural) and 'employees' used to refer to domestic workers. Some phrasing is repetitive, and the range is somewhat limited. To reach a higher band, the student should focus on using more precise collocations and a wider variety of vocabulary related to employment and social responsibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include 'the question whether people should do these duties... is a matter of debate' (missing 'of'), 'According to a recent journal has shown' (incorrect sentence structure), and 'prevent from major consequences' (incorrect preposition). While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and correct sentence construction would significantly improve the accuracy of the writing.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.