Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-07-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.
Is this a good way of providing work for others?
Should people do these things themselves?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Sometimes it is good to have a house help for the chores that individuals do not love to do or they have lack of time to do the things like daily house work or childhood care. According to me, this is good way of providing work for others because some people need a job.
Firstly, in this cutting-edge era everyone is busy because of their busy schedule. Thats why some people need to hire employee for their household chores. In addition, this may help citizens financially as unemployement rate is higher in some countries. For instance, in India several individuals are working as a maid to survive. This is not only providing work but also helping nation to grow in terms of unemployement. For example, Countries such as Nigeria, people starts to join as a house help rather than doing nothing. This leads to decresementation of unemployement.
Furthermore, others believe that individuals should handle their daily life work. However, some of them are being lazy and find it difficult to do these things. Moreover, it is also a good practice because it may keep your fit and may help in daily fitness routine.
According to the housewives, they are memaging their house work because this is helping them in their physical activities.
In conclusion, it is a best way to help people who are jobless. As they can work in someone's home and can earn good amount of money. This leads to lows the jobless rate. On the other hand, doing household chores could be the reason of good health. So, it mey be a good practices to do things.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses both parts of the prompt, discussing the benefits of providing employment and the personal value of doing chores. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. For example, the argument regarding 'laziness' is not fully explored, and the connection between household chores and national economic growth is a bit tenuous. While the position is clear, the supporting arguments lack depth and specific, well-integrated examples. To improve, you should expand on your points with more detailed reasoning rather than listing several brief ideas. The conclusion is a bit repetitive, restating points already made without adding a final synthesis.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. You use some cohesive devices like 'Firstly', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion', but these are sometimes used mechanically. The transition between ideas is occasionally abrupt, such as the shift from the economic benefits of hiring help to the argument about personal fitness. Referencing is generally clear, but the flow between sentences could be improved by using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring that each paragraph focuses on a single, well-developed theme. The paragraphing is logical, but the internal cohesion within paragraphs needs more refinement to achieve a higher score.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
Your vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. You use some non-standard or awkward phrasing, such as 'decresementation of unemployement' and 'memaging their house work'. These errors do not impede communication, but they highlight a need for more natural collocations. You rely on basic vocabulary like 'good' and 'things' frequently. To improve, focus on learning more academic synonyms and ensuring you use words in their correct context. Expanding your range to include more sophisticated, topic-specific vocabulary would significantly enhance your writing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors. Examples include 'they have lack of time', 'hire employee' (should be 'employees'), and 'it mey be a good practices'. Subject-verb agreement and article usage are inconsistent throughout the text. While your meaning is generally clear, these persistent errors prevent the essay from reaching a higher band. You should focus on proofreading for basic errors like pluralisation and verb forms. Attempting more complex sentence structures is good, but ensure you have a firm grasp of the underlying grammar to avoid frequent slips.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.