Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-07-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is often argued that people who are busy at their workplace. It is good idea to assign a person for cleaning, and look after their childrens. This is a basic responsibility of an individual to clean their house regularly, and avoid to hire a babysitter.

It is true that no one can love as much a mother loves their children. If people were hired for this position, they would become a victim of bleak future, their love and affection most likely diverted from their parents. In addition to this, by hiring a cleaner for their own house would be an expensive option if calculated on yearly basis. The money save would be used for children education, and people would spent on buying a electric mope to clean thier house. It is more trustworthy instead of giving household work to an unknown person.

The best idea is to do these household work by their own. Basic tools are available in stores. By doing their own cleaning job for your home is not only physically demanding but also brings attachment towards their own property. Nourishment of children is crucial for us because early age is important to upbringing your son and daughter in a right direction. For example, giving lessons to your kids such as give respect to elders, avoid using abuse words, and moral values, which would be good for their upcoming future.

To conclude, Athough It is beneficial for people who have busy schedule to hire a person for their personal work such as cleaning and caring their children, doing this by own demonstate love towards their own peoperty and kids.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: whether it provides work for others and whether people should do these tasks themselves. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. The argument regarding the 'bleak future' for children raised by others is a strong point, but it lacks depth. The discussion on providing work for others is briefly mentioned but not fully explored in terms of economic or social implications. The position is clear, but the supporting arguments are occasionally repetitive and could benefit from more nuanced reasoning to reach a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the argument. There is a logical progression from the introduction to the body paragraphs and the conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'In addition to this' and 'To conclude, Athough'. Referencing is occasionally unclear, particularly with pronouns like 'their' and 'they', which sometimes lack a clear antecedent. While the structure is coherent, the flow between sentences could be smoother to achieve a higher score.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for a higher band. There are several instances of awkward phrasing or incorrect word choices, such as 'bleak future', 'money save', and 'electric mope' (likely meaning 'mop'). The repetition of basic words like 'people', 'work', and 'children' limits the lexical range. To improve, you should focus on using more sophisticated collocations and synonyms to express your ideas more naturally and precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('people who are busy at their workplace' is a fragment; 'childrens' is incorrect pluralisation) and awkward sentence construction ('by hiring a cleaner for their own house would be an expensive option'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents a higher score.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.