Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-07-31
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.
Is this a good way of providing work for others?
Should people do these things themselves?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
In this fast-paced era, everybody has hectic schedule in their life. So sometime people try to pay someone who can do things behalf of them like childcare and household chores. This is a positive way of giving work to others for limited period. both reasons and relevant illustrates will be discussed further.
Examining the reasons for sometimes paying others to do work of yours is a good thing, because people are creating new jobs for uneducated person's and they can also earn some money to survive. For example, In India, there are many unemployed people who can work by doing household things and caring children. This helps to reduce unemployment rate in the country.
There are consequences of giving work to others every time, like people become lazy and dependent on others. Also, they are disconnected from their children as they give work to others of taking care of their child. On the other hand, people can do other activities by giving their task to someone. For instance, they can learn different things and do physical activities to fit their body. sometimes people feel tired and stress due to workload so they do not want to do household chores then they hire someone who can do all this things. This creates employment in the market.
To conclude, it can be finally commented that there are several reasons to pay somebody do things behalf of yours which has good effects that are creating new jobs for unemployed people and giving them money to fulfill their needs. It is a good way of providing work for others in my opinion.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the benefits of providing work for others and the question of whether people should perform these tasks themselves. The position is clear, although the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding the negative consequences of outsourcing chores is mentioned but not fully explored or balanced against the benefits. The response covers the requirements, but the ideas could be more deeply extended to reach a higher band. The conclusion summarizes the main points effectively, maintaining a consistent stance throughout the essay.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'For example', 'On the other hand', and 'To conclude', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are a bit mechanical, and the flow between sentences could be smoother. For example, the transition between the discussion of unemployment and the negative consequences of laziness is somewhat abrupt. The paragraphing is appropriate, and there is a clear overall progression of ideas, even if the internal cohesion within paragraphs occasionally feels repetitive.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There are some attempts at more specific vocabulary, such as 'hectic schedule' and 'unemployed', but the range is somewhat limited. There are also some minor errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'do things behalf of them' (should be 'on behalf of them') and 'caring children' (should be 'caring for children'). While these errors do not impede communication, they indicate a need for a wider range of vocabulary and more precise usage to reach a higher band.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles, pluralization, and prepositions, such as 'uneducated person's' (should be 'uneducated people') and 'do all this things' (should be 'do all these things'). Subject-verb agreement and word order issues are also present. While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from achieving a higher score. A greater focus on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy would significantly improve the quality of the writing.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.