Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-05
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.
Is this a good way of providing work for others?
Should people do these things themselves?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
It is becoming an increasingly common for people to pay others to complete tasks such as household chores, gardening or childcare. While this trend can generate employment opportunities and helps people manage busy lifestyles, I believe individuals should still carry out certain responsibilities themselves, particularly those related to family and personal development.
On the one hand, paying others for performing everyday tasks is an effective way to generate employment opportunities. There are many people who are not educated enough to do other jobs, these kind oof work helps them to earn their livelihood and manage their expenses. As a result, these everyday tasks offer opportunities to many people to get employed. Moreover, Works such as housekeeping, childcare and cleaning provides stable income, as people can do these jobs for long term, because hiring is conduct only after a person leave the job.
On the other hand, some duties should not be delegated because they play an important role in strengthening family relationships and developing essential life skills. Looking after one's own children enables parents to build strong emotional bond and actively participate in their children's upbringing. Likewise, completing basic household responsibilities teaches responsibility, independence and time management. If people become overly dependent on others for these small tasks, they may lose valuable skills and become less self- reliant.
In conclusion, employing others for completing basic household tasks is an effective way to provide employment prospects to people, particularly who have not qualified education. However, individuals should not be overly reliant on others for these tasks, most importantly, childcare and tasks related to family, as performing these activities by own strengthens family relationships and develop valuable skills among individuals.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the economic benefits of outsourcing tasks and the personal value of performing them oneself. The position is clear throughout, and the ideas are relevant. However, the development is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding employment could be strengthened by discussing the broader economic impact rather than focusing solely on those with limited education. Similarly, the point about family relationships is valid but could be expanded with more specific examples of how these bonds are formed. Overall, the response is well-structured and covers all requirements of the task, though it lacks the depth required for a higher band.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0
The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two sides of the argument. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion' are used effectively to guide the reader. However, there are occasional instances where the flow is slightly mechanical, and some referencing is a bit repetitive. The progression of ideas is generally smooth, but the connection between sentences could be more sophisticated to achieve a higher band score.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task. You use some relevant topic-specific terms like 'employment opportunities', 'livelihood', and 'self-reliant'. However, there are some inaccuracies and awkward phrasings, such as 'these kind oof work' (should be 'this kind of work') and 'hiring is conduct' (should be 'hiring is conducted'). The range of vocabulary is sufficient to convey your meaning clearly, but it lacks the precision and flexibility required for a higher band. To improve, focus on using more varied collocations and avoiding repetitive phrasing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is always clear, there are several grammatical errors throughout the text. Examples include 'It is becoming an increasingly common for people' (should be 'It is becoming increasingly common'), 'these kind oof work helps' (subject-verb agreement error), and 'particularly who have not qualified education' (awkward phrasing). Punctuation is generally fine, but the frequency of these minor errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. You should focus on proofreading for subject-verb agreement and article usage.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.