Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Many people do not have a time to complete their household work due to their busy schedule. To overcome this problem, they prefer to hire people. This approach is a beneficial way to providing employment to others. As per my opinion, According to my viewpoint, there is no harm to if this trend is giving a job opportunity to others but the upbringing of their children might get affected.

Hiring people to do daily house chores has some advantages. Primarily, it increases the employment towards the people with having less or no education. Because unemployment is a big challenge currently for a government to cope up with. As an example, if a candidate without education is seeking for a job, it would be a great problem for a government to provide a job. Moreover, hiring a maid or nanny may reduces the stress to the person as they have other commitments or problems on their work place to deal with. If they try to handle everything by themselves, they might end up with having mental or health risks.

However, taking care of their children would be the primary responsibility of the parents. This is to be said because the parents can shape their juveniles in a batter way as compare to the nanny or child day care facilities.

One survey was conducted by the University in America, where it was proven by the researchers that the students who were raised under their parents vigilance have achieved more success and committed less crime.

In conclusion, hiring people for daily chores and nanny services is beneficial as it creates employment and helps people to battle with their hectic schedule. However, upbringing children would be solely responsibility of the parents as their future depends on it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the economic benefits of hiring help and the personal responsibility of child-rearing. The position is clear throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding employment for the uneducated is a good point, but it could be expanded with more specific examples or deeper analysis of the societal impact. The section on child-rearing is relevant but relies on a vague reference to a 'University in America' rather than a more nuanced discussion of the balance between professional help and parental involvement. Overall, the task is addressed, but the depth of argument is consistent with a mid-range band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized into paragraphs, each with a clear focus. The introduction sets the stage, and the body paragraphs transition from the benefits of hiring help to the drawbacks regarding childcare. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Primarily', 'Moreover', and 'However', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical, and there are instances where the flow is interrupted by awkward phrasing, such as 'As per my opinion, According to my viewpoint'. While the progression is generally clear, the use of cohesive devices could be more sophisticated to achieve a higher band.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey their meaning clearly. There are attempts to use less common vocabulary, such as 'upbringing', 'vigilance', and 'hectic schedule'. However, there are several instances of imprecise word choice and collocation errors, such as 'increases the employment towards the people', 'seeking for a job', and 'shape their juveniles'. These errors do not impede communication, but they demonstrate a lack of precision that prevents a higher score. Expanding the range of collocations and refining word choice would significantly improve this area.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the writer attempts complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors, such as 'there is no harm to if this trend', 'may reduces the stress', and 'as compare to'. Punctuation is generally functional, but there are minor issues with article usage and prepositional phrases. The errors are noticeable but rarely impede the reader's understanding of the main points. To improve, the writer should focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct usage of comparative structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.