Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this modern society, some people pay to others that they do not enjoy to do or they do not have time to complete them. While other believe that it create opporunities to employers. I believe that they do not completely relay on others, they should continue to handle some responsibilities themselves, particularly, they can involve their families.

On the one hand, one of the major benefits of paying others for doing tasks could be offer employment to them. To explicate it, some people are working because they want to earn by working cleaner gardeners and babysitting due to this It is especially for those who have not access to high qualified jobs. For instance, a couple who are full time working so they do not have much time to take care their baby because of this they hire some who can look after their baby. Furthermore, hiring someone can beneficial for professionals because they can fully concentrate their work.. As a result it is quite easy for them to complete tasks due to workloads.

On the other hand, there are certain responsiblities that not completely transfer to others. For example, parents play important role in rising active child because of this, they can strong emotional bonding. Similarly, people should be willing to perform basic household tasks themselves rather than becoming completely depend on paid workers. Doing these activities can also teach individuals valuable skills and encourage a sense of responsibility.

In my opinion, hiring paid workers could be positive they if there is unwanted tasks or time consuming that would not totally dependence on others but some resposibilities are handle own their own.

In conclusion, paying others to perform certain tasks can create employment and save valuable time. However, people should maintain responsibility for important aspects of their personal and family lives rather than outsourcing everything.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the economic benefits of hiring others and the personal necessity of handling certain tasks. The position is clear throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding 'employment opportunities' is a good start, but it lacks specific detail or depth. Similarly, the point about 'emotional bonding' is relevant but could be expanded with more concrete examples. The conclusion is a bit repetitive and slightly disjointed in its phrasing. Overall, the response covers all requirements but would benefit from more thorough elaboration and more nuanced supporting arguments to reach a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized into paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'On the one hand,' 'Furthermore,' and 'In conclusion,' which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'due to this It is especially for those...' and 'because of this they hire some who can look after their baby.' The referencing is sometimes unclear, and the flow between sentences is occasionally interrupted by grammatical errors. While the overall progression is logical, the use of cohesive devices is not always smooth or flexible.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There are some attempts at more sophisticated language, such as 'explicate' and 'outsourcing,' but these are sometimes used in contexts that feel slightly unnatural. There are also several word-choice errors, such as 'rising active child' (should be 'raising') and 'not completely transfer to others' (should be 'cannot be completely transferred'). While the range is sufficient to communicate the main points, the lack of precision and occasional errors in collocation prevent a higher score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow of reading. Examples include 'some people pay to others that they do not enjoy to do' (should be 'pay others to do things they do not enjoy'), 'a couple who are full time working' (should be 'a couple who work full-time'), and 'they if there is unwanted tasks' (should be 'if there are unwanted tasks'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of errors in basic sentence construction limits the score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.