Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.
Is this a good way of providing work for others?
Should people do these things themselves?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In this contemporary world, people are spending their precious time in their workplace rather than in their home. Although some people believe that there is a chance to pay other to perform the work that either people do not want to do or if they are not able to manage time to perform like essential house work or baby sitting. Thus, this essay will discuss why this is helpful in economy as a advantage as well as if people can perform everything by their own or not.
The first and foremost reason on positive side is job creation. To elaborate , when people are appointing other to perform work such as cleaning, nannies, gardening and cooks, could helpful for someone else to get a job even though they do not have an advanced degree or qualification. Thus, it is an excellent option fin terms of flexible income concept. In addition, it improves the circulation of money by high earners to local services providers. Hence, economy becomes much stronger as each and everyone within nation are earning money.
However, individuals may have to perform these duties by their own as it enhances the family bonding. To explain, raising children by parents in lieu of baby sitter could strengthen the bond between parents and child and as a result, this concept eventually helps in building trust which is a major part of life between whole family. Moreover, Financial saving becomes more easier to achieve since folks are performing each and every duty of house by themselves, and the money which they are paying towards local services providers should goes in investment or saving sectors.
In conclusion, concepts of helpers could be excellent in terms of job creation and economy boosts. If individuals perform this work by themselves, it allows them to make family bonding stronger as well as to increase significant saving ratio.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the economic benefits of outsourcing chores and the personal value of performing them oneself. The position is clear throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention job creation and family bonding, the arguments could be extended with more specific examples or deeper analysis to reach a higher band. For instance, the economic argument could touch upon the trade-off between professional productivity and domestic outsourcing. The essay covers all requirements, but the depth of exploration is consistent with a Band 6.0 level.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a central theme. Cohesive devices such as 'In addition', 'However', and 'To explain' are used to guide the reader. However, there are some instances where the flow is slightly mechanical or awkward, such as the transition in the introduction: 'Although some people believe that there is a chance to pay other... Thus, this essay will discuss...'. The use of referencing is generally clear, but some sentences feel slightly disjointed. Overall, the progression of ideas is coherent, meeting the criteria for Band 6.0.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, including terms like 'contemporary', 'qualification', and 'investment'. There are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'performing each and every duty of house' (should be 'household chores') and 'money... should goes in' (should be 'should go into'). While you attempt to use less common vocabulary, these minor errors and occasional awkward phrasing prevent the response from reaching a higher band. The vocabulary is sufficient to convey your meaning clearly, which is characteristic of a Band 6.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While you attempt complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement ('money... should goes') and article usage ('in economy as a advantage'). Some sentences are slightly ungrammatical, such as 'could helpful for someone else' (missing 'be'). Despite these errors, the meaning remains clear throughout, and the mistakes do not impede communication. The control of grammar is consistent with a Band 6.0, as you show a mix of structures but lack the consistent accuracy required for higher bands.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.