Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

These days, people are hiring others for the assistance of domestic chores or for taking care their children due to hectic schedule or overcome the burden of work. I believe this is fair to provide income opportunities to others as well if they so not have spare time for these activities rather than do all the tasks themselves.

One major reason of this method is justifiable is, it facilitates both the parents for working. As if someone nourishes their kids and doing their daily household things. Perhaps they both can achieve their career aspects by providing their full performance on working areas. In addition to this, there are many ladies who are illiterate and unable to work other places due to commuting or communication barriers. These type of work can create their earning sources. Therefore, it is reasonable to offer these work other which fulfill the needs of both the parities.

I believe if a person donot have sufficient time then he or she should not overburden herselves. As every workplace has the high expectation from a person. Work-life balance becomes a major issue for the occupied partners. In that case, surely, they might get help from others. Nevertheless, they should not fully rely on the care-takers as they also need spend time at home and check that everything goes appropriately that can overcome the probability of mishappening such as thieves.

In conclusion, taking a help from others to do chores by paying money is not a bad deal. As it is beneficial to get help from others if a person is unable to do those things.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the benefits of providing work for others and the question of whether people should perform these tasks themselves. The position is clear throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding illiterate women is a good point, but it lacks specific elaboration on how this impacts the broader economy or society. The conclusion is a bit repetitive and does not fully synthesize the arguments presented. To reach a higher band, you should aim to expand on your supporting points with more detailed explanations or concrete examples, ensuring that each paragraph contributes significantly to the overall argument.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. There is an attempt to use cohesive devices such as 'In addition to this', 'Therefore', and 'Nevertheless'. However, the flow between sentences is sometimes mechanical, and some transitions feel slightly forced. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as in the phrase 'These type of work', where the antecedent is not perfectly aligned. While the overall progression is coherent, the use of cohesive devices could be more natural and varied to improve the flow of ideas between and within paragraphs.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey their meaning clearly. There are some attempts at using less common vocabulary, such as 'hectic schedule' and 'overburden', which is positive. However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'nourishes their kids' (instead of 'raising' or 'caring for') and 'career aspects' (instead of 'career goals'). Additionally, there are minor errors in word form, such as 'parities' instead of 'parties'. To improve, focus on learning collocations and using words in their correct context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ('if a person donot have', 'they so not have') and pronoun usage ('overburden herselves'). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are some sentence fragments and awkward phrasing that slightly impede the reader's flow. While the meaning is always clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on basic subject-verb agreement and consistent verb tense usage would significantly improve the accuracy of your writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.